Pourquoi parler de "bougnoules" quand "musulmans" ou "communautaristes" suffisent? mobile.lemonde.fr/idees/article/…
November 2013
143 tweets
Dites @Clt_VoyagesSncf, les €5 supp. par enfant pour le TGV Family c'est juste une boutade ou on est sensé avoir mieux que ce wagon pourri?
@SNCF_QR Vous avez une réponse à la question qui débute ce fil?
Ceux qui parlent de démission parentale face à la délinquance n'ont pas vu un TGV Family le dimanche soir de grand retour.
Replying to @JoniFlingo and @Uxlco, @STPo
Et en général ça demande une implémentation complexe. @glazou
Replying to @SNCFVoyageurs and @SNCF_QR
Sur le La Rochelle-Paris de 14h hier, un wagon entier a payé le supplément «family» sans avoir de service correspondant.
Replying to @SNCFVoyageurs and @SNCF_QR
Euh non. Vous escroquez un wagon entier et vous comptez sur l’inertie des gens pour ne pas réclamer. Remboursez, c’est tout.
Replying to @SNCFVoyageurs and @SNCF_QR
De plus, le chef de bord n’était au courant de rien.
Replying to @SNCFVoyageurs and @SNCF_QR
Euh, je vous signale un dysfonctionnement clair de vos services, c’est à vous de prendre l’initiative.
Replying to @SNCFVoyageurs and @SNCF_QR
Donc vous confirmez que vous volez €5 par tête à tout un wagon, puis faites en sorte de rendre le remboursement difficile? Bravo…
Replying to @poulpita
You’re welcome darling!
Vous pensez qu’en étant principalement impliqué dans l’écriture de spécifications W3C, je peux adhérer à l’AGESSA?
Replying to @null and @karlpro
Écoute, ça me paraît au mieux flou, mais je vais les contacter pour voir!
Replying to @rdeltour
oui j'ai lu la doc, mais ça paraît tentable. Bien meilleur service que le RSI, et beaucoup moins cher!
Replying to @julien_igel
ça remplace!
«It's as smart as it's wrong, and it's very, very smart.»
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Sure. I'll think about that on my upgraded flight, before I hook up with the cool kids for some beers. @sgalineau
Replying to @JackNUMBER
C'est une fonctionalité qui dépend de l'interface, et n'est pas normalisée par le @W3CFrance. Il faut leur demander directement!
The fun thing with making your photos CC-BY is that they then show up in the strangest contexts news.wpr.org/post/bill-seek…
♥ 3↺ 2
Replying to @rdeltour
That’s not even a CC-BY picture though :)
Replying to @JackNUMBER
Je ne suis pas sûr de ce que vous voulez standardiser. Le comportement des passwords est normalement natif. @W3CFrance
Replying to @JackNUMBER
Non, ça c’est vraiment complètement du domaine de la plateforme. @W3CFrance
If you’re bored to tears with regular science mags, give @NautilusMag a spin — different tack, refreshingly well-written.
♥ 1
Replying to @hsivonen
Replying to @rubin
Je pense qu'un ARRETE marchera mieux.
Replying to @rubin
ceci dit, j'attends toujours la recommandation du Ministère de la Santé de NE PAS MANGER TROP SALE.
Watch out #TPAC, I'm coming to make merry with your beer and your werewolves!
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @amyvdh
I should hit the hotel around 2130 tomorrow. See you soon!
Markdown. It's, like, all the expressivity of email with all the interoperability of email in one swell package.
Git aliases to fetch pull requests: gist.github.com/gnarf/5406589
♥ 1
«Don’t close your laptops [to listen to me speaking], just keep on hacking.» @timberners_lee at #TestTWF Shenzhen
♥ 11↺ 16
«There is no more mercy in him than there is milk in a male tiger.» Go home Shakespeare, you’re drunk.
♥ 1
OH «Those are, like, troll socks man. Well played.» #TPAC
♥ 1
Judging from its comments, it would seem that someone at @w3cmemes doesn’t know how to immanentise the eschaton.
«The second operating system hiding in every mobile phone» osnews.com/story/27416/Th… (via @recifs).
↺ 2
Interesting Community Group proposal for high performance processing on the Web (e.g. with SIMD) w3.org/community/grou…
↺ 2
Europe approves use of in-flight electronics during take-off and landing theguardian.com/technology/201…
♥ 1↺ 1
Replying to @JoniFlingo and @Uxlco
Oui, l’article c’est l’homme qui a vu l’homme qui a entendu parler de l’ours qui voudrait du DRM. @framaka
New French law prevents DRMed ebooks from being considered books — excluding them from reduced taxes. assemblee-nationale.fr/14/amendements… (via @recifs)
♥ 12↺ 81
The reasoning being that DRMed books aren’t books but reading licenses; so are not eligible for tax incentives applicable to books.
♥ 3↺ 29
Replying to @getifyX and @getify
What the text actually says is that a book is only a book if it’s owned and in an open format. @jalbertbowdenii
Replying to @getifyX and @getify
But it strips what author’s claim? To have published a book? The law’s just about taxes... @jalbertbowdenii
Replying to @getifyX and @getify
I mean, no one’s ever going to say «oh you wrote under DRM, you’re not an author». Am I missing something? @jalbertbowdenii
Replying to @null and @marcosc
It’s a strong incitation for publishers to just drop DRM.
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Publishers know if their books are DRMed. If they don’t pay the right taxes, they will get caught.
Replying to @thisNatasha and @annevk
Are you all shitfaced in HK?
Replying to @null and @marcosc
You have weird priorities! VAT is primarily about sales.
Replying to @mnot
I know. We’re chilling on the beach in Dameisha, doing yoga and penguins. Mostly penguins. @thisNatasha @annevk
Replying to @sangwhanmoon
What’s the other way to fly? @thisNatasha @annevk
Replying to @wilhelmja
Because you are presently unable to articulate? @thisNatasha @annevk
Ok, #TPAC over, attempting reentry into normal life. It was great to see you all!
♥ 3
Si vous êtes de ceux qui insistent pour tout traduire en français, par pitié traduisez «draft» par «ébauche» et non «brouillon». Merci!
♥ 2↺ 2
Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d
Tu confonds avec «draught» :)
Replying to @null and @karlpro
Je pense que le contexte est légèrement différent :)
Replying to @edasfr
Déjà, c’est plus joli. Dans un brouillon, tout est sale et doit être mis au net, alors que dans une ébauche il est attendu que...
Replying to @edasfr
…certaines parties soient déjà bien avancées. Ça correspond mieux à la réalité.
Replying to @null and @karlpro
«ébauche de travail» ça marche (même si un poil pléonasmique), «brouillon de travail» euh pas trop.
Replying to @null and @karlpro
C’est là mon point exactement.
Replying to @TheSFReader
♥ 1
Replying to @TheSFReader
Replying to @TheSFReader
Replying to @TheSFReader
Replying to @TheSFReader
The call for papers for @xmlprague is up! I need to think of a good non-XML topic for this year :) xmlprague.cz/call-for-paper…
Replying to @null and @karlpro
Pas assez troll pour le public :)
Replying to @null and @karlpro
Hmmmmoui, mais ça ne trolle pas spécifiquement un public XML. I need a topic that trolls @ndw very personally :)
Replying to @null and @ndw
«Parce que!!!»? youtube.com/watch?v=EHY4I2…
Why Does Dark Energy Make the Universe Accelerate? preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/11/1…
Replying to @wz43rtx and @karlpro
mais moins débauché.
Replying to @null and @ndw
how else am I to draw your august attention? @jirkakosek
Replying to @AutomatedTester
Hmm, thanks. Sigh.
Replying to @leobalter
Do you happen to have a source for that or are you just making stuff up? @alexanderfowler
Replying to @leobalter and @alexanderfowler, @danielfilho, @ale_borba
Thanks. Do you have more details, like session, name? Was it W3C or W3C *Office*?
Replying to @leobalter and @alexanderfowler, @danielfilho, @ale_borba
Was it this guy? conferenciaweb.w3c.br/wp-content/the… or linkedin.com/pub/vagner-din…
Replying to @null and @ndw
Well played sir, well played.
Replying to @leobalter and @alexanderfowler, @danielfilho, @ale_borba
I can now confirm there were no people from the W3C Staff at that conference.
Replying to @leobalter
If someone from the Brazil W3C office said that, please give me as much detail as possible — they need to be seriously talked to.
Replying to @leobalter
Offices are not W3C. They do not speak for W3C, let alone set its policies. See w3.org/Consortium/Off….
Replying to @leobalter
If they went off tracks, 1) we are *very* sorry, and 2) we would like to act to make sure that does not happen again. Thanks!
♥ 1↺ 1
Dahut liqueur? But of course.
♥ 2↺ 2
Replying to @leobalter
Sure, I’m robin@w3.org. Thanks a lot!
When We Lose Antibiotics, Here’s Everything Else We’ll Lose Too wired.com/wiredscience/2…
Replying to @vgholkar
:-) Except he has a red beard! (Also, mine is much more trimmed nowadays.)
Replying to @Grunt_ and @bortzmeyer
MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! *cough* Non rien. [sourire goguenard]
Replying to @jensimmons
w3.org/2009/cheatshee… can be pretty good, and it works offline.
Replying to @Grunt_ and @bortzmeyer
Il me suffit d’un patch d’une ligne pour rajouter le support gopher dans HTML5. Hmmmmm, tentant…
Replying to @Grunt_
Vous êtes vieux jeu les gens de l'Internet, il faut savoir s'amuser un peu! w3.org/html/wg/drafts…
Replying to @brucel
Actually, it has. "In the beginning was a landscape of vacua." So much clearer. @tabatkins
Replying to @pascalriche and @AymericPontier
Pffft, on n'est donc les meilleurs en rien!
The death of TV looks pretty much unavoidable by now businessinsider.com/cord-cutters-a… (via @patricelamothe )
♥ 1
What’s all the hoopla with @medium’s editor? I used it for a trivial post and I almost punched my laptop. *And* the post came out wrong.
Replying to @null and @m_strehl
Clearly :)
Bah, pour une fois qu’il y a une maire que j’aime bien, @DominiqueVoynet ne se représente pas… dominiquevoynet.eelv.fr/je-ne-suis-pas…
«Oui, je l’ai vu sur le blog de Vadim.»
— Ashley, 4 ans #MoyenneSection2013
Are there sites you’d particularly recommend for a 4yo to become somewhat acquainted with computers?
↺ 1
Replying to @doriantaylor
Don’t you need to be literate for that?
Replying to @doriantaylor
I should look more closely, but I recall needing to understand at least something of angles?
Replying to @doriantaylor
Haha, nice :)
Replying to @doriantaylor
Yeah, I like the gadget but I’m not sure as to how needed it really is. Kids *do* get that what’s in the computer is real.
Want to improve MathML support? Finally bring science to the Web? Join the funding campaign! ulule.com/mathematics-eb…
♥ 8↺ 20
Replying to @jpcs
Thanks!
Scientists Seek Other Scientists for Cosmology Problem jpl.nasa.gov/m/news/?releas… (via @anaisrassat)
♥ 1↺ 4
Replying to @null and @ivanca
Heh! Wouldn’t that be a job better served by code { text-decoration: js; }? @littlecalculist @t @w3c
Replying to @null and @ivanca
I understand, but adding syntax highlighting to HTML itself (or CSS) is pretty heavyweight — I doubt it would pass
Replying to @null and @ivanca
That said, something more generic could be useful. Register js as a conlang and use <code lang=‘art-js’>.
Replying to @null and @ivanca
Then toss in the ability for CSS to match and style text ranges — you might have something :)
Replying to @takeoffconf
Whoa that’s just too nice :)
Replying to @adamretter
That’s already possible man! Albeit not well documented. You can build a different profile.
Replying to @adamretter
The «beryl» bit in github.com/darobin/respec… is an example.
Replying to @adamretter
Hang on, let me dig up some notes I took.
Replying to @adamretter
I’m emailing you some details — if it’s helpful enough I’ll use that to make docs.
Replying to @adamretter
I’m missing the Loren reference, but you’re welcome! Please pester me with problems, I want to make this easy for people.
Replying to @adamretter
In the longer future I’m thinking about separating ReSpec and the W3C version, and add build tools to make this trivial.
Replying to @adamretter
In my dream universe someone would at some point hire me to do some very complex scientific doc processing with this baby :)
@rodneyrehm Hey, are you going to TakeOff? I was thinking we could sit down and work through that <select> thing before we’re too drunk.
Replying to @rodneyrehm
Sure thing!
The 2013 Common Crawl data has arrived! commoncrawl.org I wonder how we could process this properly.
♥ 3↺ 1
You liked DRM on your movies? On your books? How about on your cars? blogs.fsfe.org/gerloff/2013/1…
♥ 1↺ 5
The End of Time, by @JulianBarbour. A fascinating and innovative take on what time is (or not) in cosmology.
Replying to @romink
. But, '/nothingnessnothingness .
... M
euh wtf. Ça s'est écrit dans ma poche! Poétique, remarque.
Replying to @romink
oui, mais ça m'embête un peu qu'une partie de mon corps si proche de ma bite te tweete de façon autonome.
Replying to @tobie
wow, glad you told me. I'm not upgrading anytime soon.
Replying to @tobie
I found Sublime to be an atrocious piece of crap both times I tried it. If you figure out how to make it usable I'm interested.
Replying to @sangwhanmoon
you're such a professional douche my friend. @tobie
Replying to @JeniT
you should publish the ontology.
Replying to @patricelamothe
Si seulement on avait un bon outil de curation pour les organiser nous-mêmes... :-)