Replying to @edasfr and @nhoizey
C'est aux smileys qu'on reconnaîtra les vrais!
May 2016
126 tweets
Would you recommend any courses/books/approaches to an industrial designer wishing to switch to UX design?
♥ 4↺ 1
Replying to @TzviyaSiegman
Ooh, cool!
Replying to @marie_ototoi
Merci!
Replying to @gordonbrander
I was wondering about that but unsure since I don't game. I'll pass it on, thanks! @jesseschell
Replying to @ElliotLepers
Reprise ou début? J'ai jamais rien reçu!
Replying to @ElliotLepers
J'ai pas dû recevoir la confirmation, je suis sûr de m'être inscrit au Tank :-)
♥ 1
Is it just me or have the TSA started making an effort to act somewhat more like, you know, humans?
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @klick_ass
It's several times in a row that they smile, make jokes, are helpful, etc.
Replying to @adam42smith
Yeah, I've been wondering about that, but they seemed to be nice to all. One can hope!
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @amyw3c
Working on a sequel (but I don’t think funny).
If like me you were somewhat baffled by @AtomEditor’s double-click change to the tree view, here is the fix: atom.io/packages/singl…
Welcome to science! «Accessing Publisher Resources via a Mobile Device: A User’s Journey» scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/05/04/acc… (via @tiffbogich)
↺ 1
Replying to @null and @anseljh
I didn’t want to add a rant on @GitHub but the change was completely baffling usability-wise and really annoying. @AtomEditor
Replying to @null and @wion, @storyneedle
Actually, «block» elements aren’t a defined notion (see w3.org/TR/html5/dom.h…) and things colloquially called block 1/2
Replying to @tomdale
In open standards, what's weird is people who don't :-)
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Who are you and what have you done with my good old grumpy friend Marcos?
Replying to @null and @marcosc
And semicolons. Programming quality is all about semicolons.
Rosanvallon, ce plaisantin.
♥ 1
"Misperceiving Bullshit as Profound Is Associated with Favorable Views of Cruz, Rubio, Trump and Conservatism" journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
If you don't know what drowning *actually* looks like, you should take five minutes to read this.
Quoting a tweet by @NautilusMag ↗
There should be a name for places that have a child diaper changing station only in the women's restrooms.
♥ 9↺ 12
Replying to @Delphine_D
Obviously, but that doesn't feel guttural enough to convey how I feel about them :-)
Vous dites comment «scholarly publishing» en français?
Replying to @foldedfish
Obviously, but I’m more looking for «I went there yesterday, they have great pool tables but it’s a ____».
Replying to @null and @tkissing
Ha! Well played!
Replying to @w3cmemes
I hope this means @jensimmons gets an account with you :-)
Replying to @rdeltour
Pour l’instant je suis sur «publication de recherche» mais je ne suis pas sûr non plus. Académique ça ne couvre qu’une partie!
Replying to @rdeltour
C’est flou mais tout le monde comprend de quoi tu parles :)
Replying to @rdeltour
Je vais soumettre un article qui utilise ce terme à une revue de bibio — si ça passe j’imagine que c’est bon :)
Replying to @rdeltour
Blague à part, c’est pas mal — je le note, merci!
Dear Google, is Chrome really such a sorry browser that you need to constantly nag me to switch to it?
♥ 5↺ 2
Replying to @briankardell
I would totally read a series of your choiciest expletives about accessibility.
♥ 1
I wonder if within a couple years Electron apps might not be what ends up making Linux on the desktop usable.
♥ 5
Replying to @fabricedesre
Why? IIRC that’s one of the few parts of Linux UI that actually has some decent implementations.
Replying to @fabricedesre
I don’t know, it’s been a good ten years since I’ve used desktop Linux to be honest :)
omml2mathml - a small JS library to convert from Microsoft's Office OMML to MathML
github.com/scienceai/omml…
♥ 2↺ 3
Replying to @domenic
Well yeah, but we have those :)
Replying to @wycats
I don't understand how it was so detached before, this is the course correction I've been waiting for for a long time!
♥ 1
Replying to @zeigenvector
I wish there were a syndrome name for that.
Replying to @jaffathecake
C) Has always been full stack because that's all there was twenty years ago?
♥ 1
Replying to @jaffathecake
My thoughts exactly. I reckon started full-stack is before ~2000 or after ~2010, in between started specialist.
↺ 1
Replying to @patrick_h_lauke
Also, as an equivalent of full-stack it meant that you knew where to find the filters menu in Photoshop. @jaffathecake
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Yeah, back in 96 this was just a temp gig while I figured out what I wanted to do. Should get to it. @patrick_h_lauke @jaffathecake
Replying to @null and @marcosc
And graphics editing was so much more fun with no layers and a single level of undo. @patrick_h_lauke @jaffathecake
Replying to @null and @marcosc, @patrick_h_lauke, @jaffathecake
Kiddo, that's how Photoshop was! Warez on Zip drives from the guy at that seedy computer shop.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @marcosc, @patrick_h_lauke, @jaffathecake
Anyway, the nurse says I should stop being agitated like this.
Replying to @ScienceBritain
.@ScienceBritain @mattwridley For this to be valid you'd have to compare pre/post effect of joining. As science goes, your post is a joke.
♥ 2↺ 2
"What would you do if your income were taken care of?" Largest ad poster ever, supporting basic income 4.bp.blogspot.com/-4sUgU2wWYZ0/V… (via @tobie)
♥ 1↺ 2
They made a tool to manage the «Journal of Open Source Software», aka JOSS. Yes, they called it «whedon»: github.com/openjournals/w… 💘
♥ 2
— It’s a mock-up, but in React.
— Ah, so really a rock-up.
♥ 1
Replying to @TzviyaSiegman and @bradneuberg
That would be a pleasure :)
Crayola has this service where they turn any drawing into a real stuffed animal. Yeah, it’s, uh, for the kids.
imaginables.crayola.com
♥ 2
Replying to @blahah404
But to @mrgunn’s point, breaking a market stronghold requires investment. Keeping VC away is a pro-status-quo stance. @csarven
♥ 1
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
If you want to change things at scale & over time, you need a sustainable organisation, beyond ad hoc financing. @mrgunn @csarven
♥ 1
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
Replying to @blahah404
I’ll be interested in hearing your feedback on announcements we’ll be making soon :) @mrgunn @csarven
♥ 2
This is probably one of the saddest pages about the Web platform nowadays. No wonder people style in JavaScript. caniuse.com/#search=%3Ahas
♥ 18↺ 11
Replying to @tigt_
I know, it really sucks. Then everyone acts surprised that people use a million nested <div> with twenty classes each.
♥ 2
Replying to @davidbaron
You did, but it was a *very* long time ago — doesn’t matter! I just quoted it because it was funny in context. @hexalys
Replying to @Turblog
Même question :-)
Replying to @FremyCompany and @briankardell, @gregwhitworth, @hexalys, @davidbaron
Yeah, .has is just sugar, already doable.
Replying to @bonidier and @Turblog
merci!
My 6yo: "I want to make lots of drawings and sell them, then I'll have enough money to save the great apes." 😻
♥ 8
Replying to @null and @nolanlawson
The most important bit is to not bring it up. I slipped and explained a platform behaviour based on Netscape 2 the other day.
Replying to @null and @nolanlawson
People stared.
Replying to @Sniperovitch
On n'atteint pas ce niveau de génie sans explorer quelques erreurs. @cinnamonfraize
♥ 1
Replying to @Sniperovitch
C’est le prochain grand hit de @Beyonce.
cssnow: a «don’t think about it» CSS preprocessor, sort of like cssnext used to be: github.com/scienceai/cssn…
♥ 5↺ 5
Replying to @humbledaisy
Ha! Best option to date :-)
Replying to @invisiblecomma
A great use case for the @internetarchive! It would indeed be great if @CrossrefOrg made data dumps available.
It would likely help a lot with the performance/reliability issues. @internetarchive @CrossrefOrg
Replying to @blahah404
There you go! Thanks :) Looked for this a few times, very glad it’s there. @invisiblecomma @internetarchive @CrossrefOrg
♥ 1
Replying to @invisiblecomma
Yeah, I played with something like this but I regularly got 500s on cursors.
Replying to @invisiblecomma
I didn’t try with your tool, this was a few months back. Maybe they work now! I need to revisit github.com/scienceai/cros…
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
You've never held down the key to repeat and hated this "feature's" guts? Combining keys FTW. @fakebaldur @hughmcguire
♥ 2
Replying to @jwajsberg
Très beau travail floral.
Replying to @jwajsberg
Et ça tu mets pas la photo?
Replying to @poulpita
Soutien total youtu.be/IdSpxkY3jOE
Every year, around this time, a question returns to haunt the world: what is it that is so hard about crafting even half-decent sandals?
Replying to @vihaire
photo?
Replying to @vihaire
Pas mal, mais trop techniques à mon goût. Moi je suis comme Souchon, j'veux du cuir.
Replying to @null and @ndw
Why not use the API instead? It has everything.
Replying to @null and @ndw
I'm mobile, poor connection, but you can find a "w3capi" module in W3C's github, it has details.
♥ 1
Remember when @amazon was considered a reference in Web development best practices? What happened to them?
Replying to @null and @jar346
Srsly? And there's no other CTO in the world?
Replying to @null and @jar346
It sure seems possible, but still: they could find someone who's used a phone once or twice.
Replying to @vgholkar
For instance it's a joke on mobile.
Replying to @vgholkar
I'm sure it's substantial.
Replying to @null and @marcosc, @ndw
Yes, had I known what you were after I'd have suggested that :-) Less data overall and not just W3C but easier to use.
Replying to @null and @marcosc, @ndw
Also, I made a nice client library for you to use, you didn't have to use Python :-*
Replying to @_aurelienfabre and @_noemes
Trop classe l'illustration!
Replying to @_aurelienfabre and @_noemes
Je me demande s'il y a des dessinateurs qui feraient encore ça. C'est tout un monde à reconstruire :-)
Replying to @_aurelienfabre and @_noemes
Hahaha, parfait!
Balançoire accessible: vous avez déjà vu ça en France?
♥ 5↺ 7
Replying to @rdeltour
Ça me rassure que ça existe un peu, mais c'est clairement rare!
Replying to @cyberbaloo_
J'en ai déjà vu deux dans mon quartier, je ne savais pas que ça existait...
Replying to @davrous
Tu veux que j'essaie de me renseigner?
Replying to @cyberbaloo_
Oui, alors que la ville est largement un bordel par ailleurs. Ça montre un bon sens des priorités!
Replying to @null and @notabene
Oui moi aussi je te fais des bisous.