July 2024
55 tweets
Along with 35 colleagues, I have signed an open letter to the UN to keep the internet decentralised, open, and multistakeholder. While our governance model needs an upgrade, replacing it with hierarchical state control is not the answer. #OpenInternet
open-internet-governance.org/letter
♥ 15↺ 9
Starting next month I will be living in Brussels, Belgium! 🇧🇪
If you're there, know good people who are, want to meet when you're visiting, hit me up! My exact arrival is still unspecified, but will be "in August". I'm excited to see folks there and for what we can accomplish!
♥ 48↺ 3
Yup!
♥ 1
Je n'ai pas encore de plan mais j'y songerai! Pareil dans l'autre sens!
♥ 1
It would be a pleasure!
♥ 1
It just might happen 😉
♥ 1
You better come visit the EU too!
Also, I need to have some drinks in NYC to say goodbye at some point.
♥ 2
I get there the 10th for Camp, you better still be around!
Hell yes!
♥ 1
Thankfully there's always Dutch, which they also speak correctly there.
♥ 1
Yes, brilliant! Definitely reach out then!
♥ 2
Thanks! Reach out if you get to go next time!
♥ 1
Super! Je te dirai quand je sais.
En partant de numéro, tu as un conseil opérateur mobile et internet?
Great, thanks, looking forward to it!
♥ 1
I'm sure it will, thank you so much! ♥
♥ 1
Same job!
Where in Europe? It would definitely be great to finally meet!
♥ 1
Germany is great, London used to be great but I've only been hearing bad things since Brexit. I didn't want to go to France, I feel nothing much is happening there. If you want to speak French you should think about Brussels 😁
Haha, merci pour ces détails, je vais regarder de plus près. Ça peut difficilement être pire qu'aux US… J'avais fait un contract pour Proximus en 97 ou 98, un CMS de FAQ multilingue en Perl — fun times!
♥ 1
Hell of a good week.
♥ 2
Information wants to be free
from corporate capture.
♥ 6↺ 2
Has anyone written a unified view of the major fees & rents that tech platforms impose on other businesses (eg. from app stores, ad cuts, seller fees), not counting imposed labour?
These are de facto the internet's tax system. I'd find a collated view of it useful & fascinating.
♥ 22↺ 11
Maybe @ViliLe?
♥ 1
For commerce yes, though for e.g. ads it's often quite obscure.
My interest is to find out, if we put these fees under democratic control, what kind of money do we have to work with, for instance for digital infrastructure (or for reducing the rent).
♥ 1
We often talk about ethics in tech but how much of an impact has that really made? I think that we can do better, but for that we need to give up on useless habits, hone our skills, and focus a lot more on governance.
berjon.com/ethicswishing/
♥ 11↺ 5
Agreed — I don't think I said otherwise? (Though perhaps not clearly enough?) My point isn't so much about the stretching of words but rather about *limiting* to ethics.
♥ 1
J'ai essayé de souscrire une offre mais ça ne marche pas et le système d'aide par chat avec une AI est totalement débile et anti-client. C'est assez honteux.
As a governance person, I must insist that rather it is ethics that is part of governance ;-)
When are you next in Brussels? ;-)
♥ 2
I mean the Technocracy movement never died, it just went quietly mainstream. All major tech companies have a completely modernist ideology to the point of not understanding that it's an ideology. It's not subtle, just taken as simply the way things work.
♥ 1
Question for the lawyers: when a browser links to a search engine and gets paid for the traffic, what distinguishes that from affiliate marketing?
♥ 6↺ 2
Not quite the same since it's usually the same owner.
♥ 1
You know who has written about how our concentrated tech monocultures create fragile systems that predictably collapse at large scales?
Yup, that's right, it's @mariafarrell and I (stuck in Seattle), that's who.
noemamag.com/we-need-to-rew…
♥ 98↺ 48
One critical component of resilience is "response diversity." Intuitively, perturbations *always* happen but you never what they will be. If your entire system is a monoculture, the wrong perturbation will wipe it out; with response diversity the impact is contained.
♥ 16↺ 5
That's how forest monocultures collapse: just one illness or bug or storm, and since it's all the same species with each tree the same age all planted regularly, the illness or bug just tear through everything, the storm topples it all.
♥ 9↺ 4
And that's exactly what we're seeing with #Crowdstrike. A tiny problem affects huge chunks of worldwide infrastructure.
Building tech systems this way is a choice we don't need to make. Instead, we can build in the public interest:
berjon.com/public-interes…
♥ 13↺ 5
Delighted you like it Fatemeh!
♥ 1
I think we have more power than that, we've just lulled into thinking we don't!
♥ 1
According to the paper, they have to!
♥ 1
It must be popular, I see it *everywhere*.
♥ 1
My IT outrage never stops.
A more in-depth elegy is called for, but I will point out, with great sadness, that James C. Scott passing away on the day of the Crowdstrike incident is a sign if ever there was one, although a bit on the nose.
You know who has written about how our concentrated tech monocultures create fragile systems that predictably collapse at large scales? Yup, that's right, it's @mariafarrell and I (stuck in Seattle), that's who. noemamag.com/we-need-to-rew…♥ 98↺ 48
♥ 4↺ 1
Five years ago when the Chrome team announced the Privacy Sandbox, I called a "delaying tactic." Not getting rid of cookies as the first step was never going to work.
Today they announced that they won't be deprecating third-party cookies. That's five years wasted. tweets.berjon.com/1164583701973483525
♥ 86↺ 54
Chrome remains the only browser with no meaningful privacy protection. Worse, it tracks its users in highly deceptive and invasive ways.
What Chrome does is deliver data and eyeballs to Google. Your safety as users is entirely a secondary consideration.
♥ 22↺ 8
No diligent CISO should allow Chrome to be used except for testing.
♥ 13↺ 1
No one knows, it's an absolute shit show.
♥ 2
It's absolutely not the CMA's fault. What Google proposed has been consistently underwhelming, there was no reason whatsoever for the CMA (or anyone else) to accept it.
♥ 2
It's probably not just the regulators who are disappointed. If you work on Chrome and you've had enough propping Google up for no reason, this could be a great time to start working on making Chrome and Chromium independent.
You know you have friends who'll help.
Quoting a tweet by @PrivacyMatters ↗
♥ 10↺ 2
When I compared Google to ExxonMobil, it used to be metaphorical. Alas they seem hellbent on making me right.
Can we maybe stop pretending that the Totalitarian Bullshit Parrots are promising, let alone worth destroying the world for?
theguardian.com/world/article/…
♥ 8↺ 1
Getting writing and pictures isn't the real world. The real world is when you fuck up it punches you in the face. AI can only replicate this if it is embedded in real contexts, with real stakes, and starts from a real diversity of agents. Otherwise it's just inbreeding.
♥ 1
Periodic reminder that you can use @bluesky at bsky.app instead. It's:
✅ Open to all.
✅ Just as easy to use as Twitter, with better moderation features.
✅ Not a campaign site for Trump & technofascism.
✅ Full of fun folks!
Find me at robin.berjon.com!
♥ 7↺ 1




