Replying to @garjoh_canuck and @johnwilander, @pbannist, @r2rothenberg, @iab, @Bershidsky, @ce_tucker, @avicgoldfarb
That is a completely wrong methodology. You're comparing crack and flour, noting that crack sells for more, and concluding that it's good for the neighbourhood. You can't establish value to pubs from comparing populations in a market structure that harms them either way.