February 2013

271 tweets

No one would be stupid enough to make a dvd reader with no hardware eject, right? Oh wait, Apple did. #RebootLikeItsWindows95
↺ 2

Replying to @NachoMan

Apparently not on this mbp :-(

Replying to @NachoMan

reboot fixed it! But I hate rebooting!

Replying to @NachoMan

only on my own terms!

Replying to @null and @divya

well, The Pirate Bay isn't so hot with the children's movies :-)

Replying to @null and @xquery

bah, completely wrong! Of course you're going to derive stuff from HTML — and we should make that even simpler!

Replying to @evlist and @fgeorges, @xquery

Besides, why publish in two formats when you have one that's rich enough?

Replying to @evlist and @fgeorges, @xquery

Of course, the problem of XML people not knowing how to use modern markup remains — but there's training for that!

Replying to @evlist and @fgeorges, @xquery

And with that I duck far and low!

Replying to @fgeorges

*grin* #trollbait activated! @evlist @xquery

Replying to @fgeorges

Oh yeah, it's *so* painful that we can't use XML Schema with HTML! I cry that I'm missing SOAP every night. @evlist @xquery

Replying to @jirkakosek

The one that's been going for 20+ years without falling for intervening fashions? O:-) @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @fgeorges

Fine, but we could at least get some WSDL for JSON! @evlist @xquery

Replying to @null and @xquery

Check dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponen…. HTML has distributed extensibility in a way that XML is still only dreaming of :)

Replying to @null and @xquery, @jirkakosek, @evlist, @fgeorges

Yeah I'll miss you guys! I'll try to troll you from afar :)
Il y a des gens ici qui vont au #NumNow? Vu le programme j'hésite, mais s'il y a des potes pourquoi pas :) tnova.eu/c6.php?ec=2&l=…

Replying to @fgeorges

How else can I choreograph my messaging bus? @evlist @xquery

Replying to @null and @xquery

Viruses? I'd… be surprised!

Replying to @meyerweb

I found it difficult to get it to filter the way I wanted, but maybe I should try again. @mailmateapp

Replying to @meyerweb

I was trying to have a box with everything that's not filtered into another box.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

hahaha, ABANDON ALL HOPE!

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

give up, go with the flow, at the end of the page it really doesn't matter at all :-)

Replying to @xt00ph

well it certainly seemed to be quite powerful.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

I guess we all need our windmills :-)

Replying to @xt00ph

yeah I found it very long at first, I think it's indexing everything because after that searching is really fast.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

you seriously think you can get people to stop calling the entire platform "html5"? Yeah that's delusional alright :-)

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Isn't that what @brucel is for?

Replying to @gimsieke

I dare you :-) @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @derSchepp and @iandevlin

My experience matches that of @derSchepp, we spent years trying to get people to stop saying AJAX and it was useless :)

Replying to @null and @derekjohnson

Correct, perhaps, but not as quixotesque and so less good. @iandevlin

Replying to @patrick_h_lauke

Actually, if we include AJAX we're more broadly in the realm of metonymy. @derschepp @iandevlin

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Buzzwords aren't needed, but they necessarily happen. @derschepp

Replying to @grtjn

Err, every HTML parser returns the same DOM. If not, it's a conformance error. @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @grtjn

I can't remember the last time that I got serious differences between two browsers on this... @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @grtjn

Yeah: they're explicitly not supported. That's interoperable. @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @grtjn

If there is anything you need to be able to do but can't, we have a problem. But otherwise it's all okay! @evlist @fgeorges @xquery

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

I beg to differ. Things need names. At some point a name will catch on. It may be pedantically wrong. But *shrug*. @derschepp

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

At some point you get back to the prescriptive vs descriptive grammar debate, and that just doesn't end ;) @derschepp

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Yes, that's the right moment for one to scream "GET OFF MY LAWN YOU PUNKS!" @derschepp

Replying to @grtjn

Well, they're trying to handle XML — we're talking about HTML. Not the same thing!

Replying to @grtjn

That's because X-tech isn't designed for that. I've been advocating fixing that at the tech level for years.

Replying to @null and @derekjohnson

Don't apologise to @iandevlin, he's just a grouchy old man who wants you off his lawn.

Replying to @grtjn and @xmlprague, @xquery, @evlist, @fgeorges

Next up: The Sex Tape.

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

Well, the problem is then that you'd have to use Java :)

Replying to @null and @karlpro

It's becoming hard to hit discrepancies without actively looking for them is what I meant.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Ooop, am I trampling your flower bed? @derekjohnson

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

I reckon we should legalise guns on the Interwebs, see how that goes. @derekjohnson

Replying to @null and @karlpro

People still use scripting languages outside JS???!!! (Btw, there's html5lib for Python).

Replying to @RobbertAtWork

Well of course! 2013 edition. @grtjn @xmlprague @xquery @evlist @fgeorges

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

I can't wait to have stub binding factories generated from my XML Schema!

Replying to @LouiseEditor

Alas, no!

Replying to @DALDEI and @xquery, @grtjn

It actually *is* the goal. See SysApps!

Replying to @null and @karlpro

It took a long time to get the XML tools working too, mind you. Had to write quite a few of them myself back then.

Replying to @null and @karlpro

I actually wish I had more bandwidth to implement algos in the spec outside browsers. It's fun.

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

It depends: an alternative to do what?

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

If you s/Perl/JS/ in the last question of lists.xml.org/archives/xml-d…, my answer from 2003 still holds :)

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

But Java hardly did anything useful for client-side stuff. It's all WSDL and SOAP.

Replying to @fgeorges and @grtjn, @xmlprague, @xquery, @evlist

I promise to have my camera ready :)

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

GWT is atrocious. Saxon is great, but hardly client side tech.

Replying to @DanielKec and @xquery, @grtjn, @jaroslavtulach

And I would say that anything that can't easily tie into the rendering stack is hardly client :)

Replying to @grtjn

For interaction with the DOM, use jQuery :) @danielkec @xquery @jaroslavtulach

Replying to @grtjn

But isn't that circular?

Replying to @grtjn

Well, DOM and events are not X* stuff but we were talking about them!

Replying to @wcandillon

Storage is certainly a use case. Where's my node binding? ;)

Replying to @grtjn

That won't happen. It's much simpler and more useful to make X-tech work on HTML properly.

Replying to @grtjn

We don't need GWT. It's a useless piece of kit. jQuery is compatible back to IE6 remember.

Replying to @wcandillon

Woohoo!

Replying to @grtjn

They're making software run in an environment it wasn't created to run in. It's not surprising they have to resort to bad stuff.

Replying to @grtjn

In the higher-level project, yes, in getting Java to run in a browser, there's no way that can be elegant :)

Replying to @grtjn

Note that the problem is Java, not X*. Implementing the same in JS directly could well be great.

Replying to @grtjn

I wouldn't bother with XSLT, but I certainly would do XQ if I had the time. With modifications needed for HTML.

Replying to @grtjn

A lot of money would work just as well ;-)

Replying to @Pierre_Danet

Sorry, just reconnected, and immediately emailed back. @billmccoy
Ah, @lemonde_fr back to 1996: "Ce contenu multimédia n'est pas adapté au format mobile, vous pouvez le consulter sur le site complet." #fail
↺ 1
Apple could so get a massive boost to its aging OSX were it to replace AppleScript with JS and half-sensible APIs.
↺ 2

Replying to @hadleybeeman

My deepest commiserations ;) (Says the five-times chair). Have fun!

Replying to @jwajsberg

Well, in France it was between two men; in the US the party is really divided at its base. @johnfoliot
On my way to London to go hack a bit on AppCache.

Replying to @CarolineFel

Tu penses que les électeurs qui les ont envoyés sont à ce point homophobes ? C'est triste comme idée.

Replying to @null and @xquery

rofl! I know! But your not fixing AppCache and you're not finishing tonight...

Replying to @null and @xquery

oh dear me, "you're".

Replying to @jwajsberg

Not with quite the same people in the room :)

Replying to @jwajsberg

Non, on prévoit de rendre cette atrocité utilisable.

Replying to @brucel

Sadly, no, this is last minute and I'll be back to Paris tonight.

Replying to @wcandillon

WHAT!!!! How can I not be following you, I was sure I was following you :(
OH: "The problem with magic is that it's always unreliable." #AppCache
↺ 3

Replying to @jwajsberg

C'est trop tard, cet attribut est là pour rester. Mais ce sur quoi on bosse n'utilise pas l'attribut pour l'instant.

Replying to @jwajsberg

On essaie d'améliorer ce putain de bordel...

Replying to @edasfr

Pas encore, c'est de la discussion là. @jwajsberg
OH "Yeah but those are legacy people, we don't have to take those into account."
↺ 1

Replying to @jwajsberg

Ça roule :)
It's not even lunchtime and the #AppCache.NG meeting has already solved responsive images and DRM. What's next?
↺ 2

Replying to @grtjn

That's privileged information ;)

Replying to @briankardell

Well, just make the chrome be appcached — done!

Replying to @brucel

Apparently the answer to that involves CORS and blobs.

Replying to @jwajsberg

Definitely on the list!

Replying to @yoavweiss and @respimg

I'll make a gist when I find a second.
@yoavweiss Not at all baked, picture not contractual, etc. gist.github.com/darobin/4739457 @respimg

Replying to @jwajsberg

Screw the manifest :) gist.github.com/darobin/4739167
"So… what if requests for the cache controller went through the controller. Wait. Oooooooh" --@jaffathecake #AppCache

Replying to @yoavweiss and @respimg

We're just hashing out ideas, don't get too excited too fast! It's basically a Worker that replaces AppCache.

Replying to @yoavweiss

Only if you set controllersync. Otherwise it'd kick in for the next load. Details coming later, hard to summarise. @respimg

Replying to @wilto

Not yet, not yet, will holler when there's something to see. @yoavweiss @respimg

Replying to @yoavweiss

It's not a race condition: if async you only get caching on the *next* request (just like appcache).
"There is no magic, this is a Bring Your Own Unicorn API."

Replying to @NachoMan and @dccp

how long are you staying? Irène might be too pregnant to go there, but we live on the same train line so there...

Replying to @NachoMan

@dccp... should be a way to meet! When are you getting here?
In which @w3cmemes is cited in a serious EU study. For real.
↺ 1
In which @w3cmemes is cited in a serious EU study. For real. This time with the picture.
↺ 5

Replying to @Sniperovitch

hein quoi ?

Replying to @dccp and @xt00ph, @NachoMan

perfect, I should normally be here that week :-)

Replying to @null and @sgalineau

you're now famous with eurocrats!

Replying to @NachoMan and @xt00ph, @dccp

I tend to prefer the North East, but that's not where the touristy stuff is.

Replying to @NachoMan and @xt00ph, @dccp

Maybe close to the canal near République, would be romantic and convenient. Check that the flat isn't noisy though.

Replying to @jonathan_robie

I would suspect anyone who's not an old hand.

Replying to @xt00ph

But that's right in the middle of nowhere! @NachoMan @dccp

Replying to @xt00ph

Ah, that's a bit later, I think I'm away until the 2nd. @dccp @NachoMan

Replying to @xt00ph

Invalides! @NachoMan @dccp

Replying to @xt00ph

I think I leave for California on the 22nd, then Venice and return the 2nd. @dccp @NachoMan

Replying to @xt00ph

We'll see when I get my final dates! @dccp @NachoMan

Replying to @Turblog and @FradiFrad

Tout dépend de la puissance, ça s'est déjà passé sans que l'on n'y passe tous m.bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…

Replying to @JaroslavTulach

No, the two are orthogonal and are used together.

Replying to @rodneyrehm

well, looking for ways to abuse it is the whole point :-)

Replying to @benadida

iirc GitHub is doing something like that.
ReSpec 3.1.43 is out and now supports generating specs from the command line (thanks @anssik!) and bugfixes from @tobie and @plinss. Enjoy!
↺ 5

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Wait, I had that too. B2G just opened up while I was on GitHub for no reason. Maybe at the same time?

Replying to @k_narre

C'est comme Dallas, mais avec du sexe.
Hey @mounirlamouri, @SickingJ, and all, any reason why Firefox would just randomly have started B2G a few hours ago? Multiple witnesses!

Replying to @FremyCompany

But of course, @w3c is all about open source :) github.com/darobin/respec/

Replying to @k_narre

Tu as donc encore de belles choses à découvrir petit canard.

Replying to @FremyCompany

As an input to what? To make a suggestion to a WG?

Replying to @null and @nitot

I wonder how many people saw that — it was really weird! @mounirlamouri @sickingj

Replying to @jwajsberg

Yes, it just started up. It was a bit spooky.

Replying to @jwajsberg

Ah yes, it must've been that, thanks! cc @nitot @iandevlin

Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d

Je ne suis pas sûr de le connaitre mais je n'ai pas pu résister :)
Some personal thoughts on DRM at @w3c lists.w3.org/Archives/Publi…
↺ 4

Replying to @jreschke

It seems to be a problem with B2G apps update that causes the emulator to launch.

Replying to @null and @sgalineau

I know, there's nothing so enraging as a moderate in the middle of a religious war.

Replying to @FremyCompany

Well if those specs initially use ReSpec, that would certainly be easy. For those that don't it'll require adaptation.

Replying to @slightlylate

I guess it's all about the Feeling like a Unitarian Source Software.

Replying to @FremyCompany

If they're on GitHub, you can even maintain the fork directly. If not, you should ask that they are!

Replying to @briankardell and @fremycompany

The major problem with ReSpec is that it lacks good docs. I will be fixing that at some point this year...
↺ 2

Replying to @echotraffic and @netpme

lien cassé ?

Replying to @helloanselm

Yeah, you can point @w3c_systeam to it, they have the power to make the change. @Hixie

Replying to @NachoMan

in what ways is it different from regular gh?

Replying to @helloanselm

and don't hesitate to ping me as well over email, those archives could sure use a spring cleaning.

Replying to @NachoMan

Ok, thanks — it sounds like a great option but nothing I need right now :)

Replying to @NachoMan

Well duh!
"πfs - the data-free filesystem!" Cracked me up. github.com/philipl/pifs (via @bortzmeyer)
↺ 3

Replying to @fabricedesre

I'd be curious to know how many people were affected. It was spooky :) @brendaneich
@brucel What'll happen to Presto?

Replying to @rodneyrehm

Sorry I forgot to reply to that... It's his name at w3 :-) @tobie
First they came for Opera, and I didn't speak out because I was testing for WebKit.
↺ 4
Bon. Quelques personnes ont mangé du cheval sans le savoir. On peut parler d'autre chose maintenant ?
Comme le dit très bien mon ami @brucel, si vous voulez savoir quelle viande vous mangez, allez chez le boucher.

Replying to @ebodyguard

Certes, mais à ce moment là il y a des sujets plus importants à couvrir.

Replying to @lhirlimann

comme beaucoup, beaucoup d'autres sujets :-)

Replying to @patrick_h_lauke

yeah agreed, there's nothing wrong with honest mystery.

Replying to @patrick_h_lauke

I mostly sensed a hint of Gainsbourg in @brucel

Replying to @edasfr

bah non ils ne parlent que de ça dans la radio.

Replying to @null and @notabene, @edasfr

oui ça me donne envie d'acheter du Findus.

Replying to @julien_igel

Certes, mais ça ne vaut pas une bonne petite pluie de météorites!

Replying to @tobie

Or even worse: wikis using Markdown.

Replying to @tobie

WYSIWYG!

Replying to @tobie

Oh, given a choice I prefer HTML. It's either HTML or WYSIWYG. But alternative languages should all die.
Petition to open source Presto: change.org/petitions/oper…
↺ 3

Replying to @edasfr

Tu vois un bug, il y en avait ~1500!

Replying to @NellyFesseau

si j'avais su plus tôt je serais venu !

Replying to @rom1_pellerin and @rom1_ubidreams

j'ai regardé vite fait mais je n'ai pas vu beaucoup de doc ou d'exemples !

Replying to @rom1_pellerin and @rom1_ubidreams

hehe. J'ai vu le hangman sur GitHub mais j'ai pas trop compris. Il y avait des trucs Java, ça m'a confus !

Replying to @Sniperovitch

je me suis toujours demandé comment ça arrivait.

Replying to @Sniperovitch

ah, tu veux dire que c'est comme du stalking sauf qu'à la fin tu violes sa colloc ?

Replying to @dr_cyno and @cynorrhodon

blacksocks!
My 3yo daughter thinks there should be nail polish made of chocolate. At first I laughed. Now I'm in awe at her business sense.
↺ 2

Replying to @jeresig

That's still fairly mild, the really interesting ones wouldn't fit in a tweet :-)

Replying to @null and @sgalineau

I'm guessing you're not saying where you're going yet?

Replying to @null and @divya, @sgalineau, @tabatkins

Hey it's not in my email!

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

pour pouvoir le maltraiter, avec une boîte tu risques de tomber sur un project manager qui se laisse pas faire ! @edasfr

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

je pense que @edasfr voulait causer de ssii classique, pas de tout prestataire de services.

Replying to @edasfr and @nhoizey

oh et puis vous êtes chiants à devenir si sérieux, j'ai juste fait une blague à la con :-)

Replying to @edasfr

eh mais y a pléonasme sur la fin de ta phrase :-) #provocBack @nhoizey

Replying to @bortzmeyer and @chtitux

ÉNORME! OMG paie tes amateurs...
An interesting piece of HTML history about XHTML and the infamous Appendix C from @hsivonen lists.w3.org/Archives/Publi…
↺ 7

Replying to @wcandillon

Hmmm, I would expect everything to be async in Node! Unless there's a good reason not to.

Replying to @wcandillon

Something that might hit the network and perform data-intensive work would *certainly* be async :)

Replying to @wcandillon

It's hard to tell — how much does an iteration cost?

Replying to @wcandillon

Well the expectation in Node is that nothing like that would be synchronous. This isn't PHP :)

Replying to @wcandillon

In PHP you'd go while (give me a row) print some HTML for this row. (Or variants on this).

Replying to @wcandillon

In Node you'd expect a callback or event to call you whenever there's data available.

Replying to @wcandillon

In some cases you can't be async and you aren't async. But for data retrieval usually one is (if possible).

Replying to @wcandillon

Consider that the typical Node set up is that you have one process handling all the requests. If you block on sth, it's not good

Replying to @wcandillon

But people can work around that. Eg have a node-zorba service that reads from Zorba and gives async results to the server.

Replying to @wcandillon

I, err, I'm not sure what you're summarising here :) Maybe email would be simpler?
Brain Activity Map (BAM!) project to receive $3bn to do for brains what the Human Genome did for genetics. the-scientist.com/?articles.view… #RockNRoll

Replying to @jorabin

how much more would you give, on average? :-)

Replying to @ZeFishAndSheep

déchu! Ou c'est trop tard ?

Replying to @rauschma

There is no shortage of good EU speakers, just look at the casts at @ParisWeb, @takeoffconf, and many other conferences.

Replying to @rubin

Tu lis de ces choses aussi, toi.
Coming soon to HTML: Ruby Markup Extensions darobin.github.com/html-ruby/
↺ 3

Replying to @ShaneHudson

yes, it's a common source of confusion :-)

Replying to @null and @marcosc

lots of little characters on top of other characters!

Replying to @taki_igel

yeah, that's a bit less likely :-)

Replying to @null and @karlpro

not done yet but a step forward! Feedback welcome :-)

Replying to @null and @karlpro

the data model (as permitting styling and semantics) and its processing algorithm. Yeah, ruby looks great for footnotes :-)

Replying to @null and @karlpro

in fact I was talking with Murata-san about extending ruby to general annotations.
You can play with an implementation of the HTML extended ruby model at berjon.com/tmp/inception/….
↺ 1
I'm looking for literature on what increased division of labour most correlates with. Any thoughts? Even vague leads are welcome.

Replying to @null and @karlpro

yeah, bah, we're not about to start requiring Web technology to have sensible names!

Replying to @xt00ph

hai!
Testing the Open Web Platform w3.org/QA/2013/02/tes… from @tobie
↺ 1

Replying to @quatremer

Clay Shirky: "It's a new golden age for journalism; except for the money." :) @pierrehaski @thieulin
↺ 3

Replying to @bluesmoon

Lovely update. Would you mind filing a bug? w3.org/Bugs/Public/en… (under "HTML5 spec")

Replying to @bluesmoon

Assign it to robin@w3.org. Thanks!

Replying to @bluesmoon

Thanks a lot!

Replying to @timrdf

the bat signal! Send me an email with the problem, I'll be at the office in a couple hours.
Is there a JS template engine that is: 1) Useful (i.e. none of this logic-less madness) 2) Robust 3) Decently documented ?
↺ 1

Replying to @tchak13

Sorry, but the technical term here is "bollocks". HB is poorly documented; template-toolkit.org has great docs + highly robust.

Replying to @tchak13

Well, at least you don't have to munge your data just to get your template engine to understand it. Oh, it's also very fast.

Replying to @tchak13

My templates should have the ability to support basic view logic yes. At the very least decent if conditions ffs.
If you like beautifully designed furniture, the best in French design is now available online: leselementaires.com #design #MadeInFrance

Replying to @garannm

Overall solid, but particularly doesn't blow up when a value is null/undefined (the way Jade often will).

Replying to @jaubourg

Yeah, I've used that quite a lot but the syntax does get a bit tedious I find :)

Replying to @garannm

Looks like a very promising candidate — thanks a lot!

Replying to @jaubourg

Poor you. Aaaaaah, yes, I got them, shame on me!!! [jumps out the window] *cough* Can we IRC about this on Monday?

Replying to @null and @sideshowbarker

templates rock man!

Replying to @timrdf

withdrawal? You miss your group that much? There are plenty of pretty groups in the sea!

Replying to @danbri

obviously, but how do you count roles? Is there a good metric? More importantly, I'm looking for correlates in other variables.

Replying to @danbri

I was hoping that economy doctor @libbymiller might know :-)

Replying to @danbri and @libbymiller

not at all, I really want division of labour! I guess I'll have to read Durkheim.

Replying to @danbri

pretty cool! I had no idea the old man was around here :-)

Replying to @libbymiller and @danbri

when your brain cells grow back, do tell me about this I'd love to know :-)

Replying to @cconcolato and @w3c

I confirm problems, checking with the systeam.
"Extensible JavaScript Transformations", an interesting idea github.com/veged/xjst
Block, Element, Modifier; an interesting take on this webdev methodology: bem.info (via @chaals).
↺ 4

Replying to @cconcolato

Fixed, thanks!
It would appear that LG is acquiring webOS: techcrunch.com/2013/02/25/lg-… #AGoodOSToDieHard
↺ 2
Surprised to see so many factual errors in this @alistapart post on Device APIs: alistapart.com/article/enviro…
↺ 3
OH: "C'est la méthode à Gilles." #bazinga

Replying to @alistapart

Replying to @EricScherer

Il n'y a pas des masses d'opérateurs français qui font un peu de recherche…
W3C is looking for a new webmaster: w3.org/2013/02/Webmas…
↺ 4

Replying to @helloanselm

Yes, there's enough interaction with the systeam that it has to be on site. It's open to EU citizens though.

Replying to @jirkakosek

No, for dark reasons, being the webmaster *actually* requires knowledge of RDF.
↺ 1

Replying to @briankardell

Bah, I was sure I followed you!

Replying to @briankardell

I don't know, it's not the first time it does this. I always wonder if there's a bug or if I'm insane :-)

Replying to @briankardell

yes yes, it seemed pretty sensible :-) I'll get back to you tomorrow.
"Use Cases and Requirements for Standardizing Responsive Images" from @respimg published by the HTML WG w3.org/TR/respimg-use… #RWD
↺ 3
"The picture element" from @respimg published by the HTML WG w3.org/TR/html-pictur… #RWD
↺ 1

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

M'est avis qu'ils ont des problèmes temporels; le site d'enregistrement pour le pass Navigo requiert Java.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin, @paul_irish

At any given time there are differences between the two specs, but they tend to be quickly absorbed.

Replying to @null and @iandevlin

Oh, you're looking specifically at ping, sorry — I thought you were talking discrepancy in general. @paul_irish

Replying to @timoreilly

Soon? Isn't there evidence that this has already happened? @turian

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

I'm not at my laptop now, but do they get a generated id in the output?

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

can you send me an email? That way I can fix that in the morning.
Mornings on which I fumble for two minutes with my alarm clock before noticing that it’s my wife's that's ringing. #mornings

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

Try again with the 3.1.45 build that just shipped.

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

Ah, I hadn't noticed the push failed (dropped connection). All good now!

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

No worries, that's what users are for :) I'm fine with the changes, but I can't get to them this second.

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

If you have time for a pull request I'll review and take it. Otherwise, I'll do it but later.

Replying to @tobie

Compared to which WYSIWYG option?

Replying to @tobie

I'm serious though :) Compared to TinyMCE for instance even entering the articles in COBOL might seem great.
Some days I really wish we had a StandardsLeaks website. (No, this is not about W3C.)

Replying to @MarkusLanthaler

Thanks! I'll look as soon as I get a sec.

Replying to @glazou

Yeah, but it wouldn't be anywhere near as hilarious as the stuff that goes on in other SDOs, trust me.

Replying to @adrianba

I know why *you* would say that! @glazou

Replying to @simonstl

If evaluating is harder than inventing, then all you need to do is invent an evaluation method.

Replying to @null and @vlentz

c'est pas vrai, par exemple tu peux répandre la bonne parole: lesautruches.fr et @lesautruches!

Replying to @LeaVerou

do you reckon we should maybe add some native sprintf of sorts for that?

Replying to @LeaVerou

I wasn't thinking just for dates. Isn't the JS I18N stuff taking care of that soonish?

Replying to @awbjs

I knew there was something. Do you have a test suite? @leaverou