June 2014

297 tweets

Replying to @mounirlamouri

look at the one under the w3c user.

Replying to @mounirlamouri

I think it's useful, but the big boss of that is James.
Élection interne du W3C, score du FN: 0%. Le dernier rempart?

Replying to @null and @derekjohnson

Last I checked @WHATWG steering is through cooptation: whatwg.org/charter. I don’t know if any of those are with the FN ;)
@edasfr Il n’y a que des comités géographiques à @Nouvelle_Donne?

Replying to @edasfr

Oui, mais tous les travaux que je vois sont à l’ancienne, en réunions, tout ça. Pas de collaboration moderne. @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @edasfr

C’est nul! Eh, @Nouvelle_Donne, comment on monte une section non-géographique?

Replying to @edasfr

On pourrait lancer un Discourse, comme pour @specifiction :) @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @edasfr

Oui, mais le numérique c’est pour tous, pas juste pour l’élite qui s’en préoccupe. @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @edasfr

Ok, tu as mon mail je crois :) @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @edasfr

Ah, cool! Je viens de voir qu’il est sur la page des comités mais pas dans le tableau — du coup je l’avais raté. @Nouvelle_Donne
Et si on tuait le Parti Pirate (by @ploum) ploum.net/et-si-on-tuait…

Replying to @edasfr

J’ai écrit à l’adresse. @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @edasfr

Faut croire que oui :) @Nouvelle_Donne

Replying to @poulpita

Félicitations :) @w3c
@gfxman Sorry you didn’t make it, I sure hope you run again next year!
↺ 1

Replying to @janl

Or @arangodb, as Couch can be a touch idiosyncratic :-) @julien51 @hoodiehq

Replying to @janl

Yeah, it has a growing number of replication options. I’ll admit I haven’t deployed one yet, but they look promising.

Replying to @janl

Right, but I only use Arango locally so I haven’t had a chance to try yet.
Balisage HTML5 meets XML symposium, feat. @domenic, @alexmilowski, and yours truly. Come join the fun! balisage.net/HTML5-XML/symp…

Replying to @edasfr

Moi pareil :) @ParisWeb
Wow, iOS gets predictive text! And it’s only 2014! I know it’s insane, but next we might even get a FInder that doesn’t totally suck!
↺ 1

Replying to @null and @sgalineau

We should see it working before making such statements, though.
@ZachWeiner Is there a Stretch Goal at which we get the famed Missing Appendix?
@chaals Happy birthday!

Replying to @edasfr

Oui, je réfléchis à une solution. Tu peux filer: github.com/darobin/formic… stp?

Replying to @edasfr

Oui, mais le problème c’est d’essayer de marcher avec ce qui existe déjà.

Replying to @edasfr

Sinon on peut passer en notation JS, ça sera encore plus simple!

Replying to @null and @m_strehl

Probably more than a bookmark, man!

Replying to @null and @m_strehl

Doesn’t the bar give you the right thing once you type «spec»?

Replying to @null and @veroniqueroutin

C’est pas plutôt la 14ème région? #pardon @La27eregion
François Hollande, accordez l'asile politique à Edward Snowden kwz.me/vm
↺ 4

Replying to @edasfr

Merci!

Replying to @trygve_lie

Let your favourite browser vendors know :) @brucel @ourmaninjapan

Replying to @tobie

just because it won't happen doesn't mean we shouldn't make noise asking for it!

Replying to @edasfr

Oui je pense aussi, c’est pas parfait mais je ne crois pas qu’il y ait beaucoup d’ID 0.

Replying to @edasfr

C’est mon surmoi leibnizien, «le meilleur des mondes *possibles*» ;-)

Replying to @gfxman

I reckon that ACs haven’t heard of you much yet; I’m sure you can find a way to fix that by next time :)

Replying to @M1ke

You mean like fieldset? @ourmaninjapan @JackWeirdy

Replying to @M1ke

I thought of that, but it doesn’t play well with the way forms are normally handled, sadly. @ourmaninjapan @JackWeirdy

Replying to @M1ke

Well this encoding *does* allow to generate deeply structured docs (look at examples), just not using fieldset.

Replying to @briankardell

Well good luck to you sir. Just remember that my only academic training is in philosophy :-)

Replying to @briankardell

Well, yes, you know how my support of openness means I'm all for engaging with the dimmer parts of our community.

Replying to @briankardell

maybe I am too!

Replying to @briankardell

don't apologise mate, you can't be right all the time.

Replying to @briankardell

No I just meant that disagreeing with me just shows you're only human ;-)

Replying to @addyosmani

Glad you like it! It needs some pushing, but people seem to be picking it up indeed. @briankardell @discourse

Replying to @trygve_lie

Hey, that’s actually pretty cool indeed! @brucel

Replying to @trygve_lie

It’s funny, I never knew a name for that kind of API, so I always call it a «Sponge Query».

Replying to @trygve_lie

That should give noticeable improvements, localStorage wasn’t designed for anything even medium sized.

Replying to @trygve_lie

That makes sense — feedback welcome! Note that there’s a test implementation in the repo.

Replying to @trygve_lie

It’s not meant to be used as is, but it should be easy to improve it.
A <geo> element for marking up locations in a document? discourse.specifiction.org/t/a-geo-elemen…
↺ 4

Replying to @dret

Except that no one can agree on which existing tech to use :)

Replying to @dret

Exactly :)

Replying to @dret

More seriously, how would you use the existing stuff? In <a href=‘paris.fr’>Paris</a> how do I add the lat/long?

Replying to @dret

Discussing this on @specifiction might be easier :)

Replying to @dret

Please read my question again carefully :)

Replying to @dret

I understand that, in fact your can already do it with registerProtocolHandler(). But it doesn’t answer my question!

Replying to @dret

No offence Erik, but if XLink is the solution it’s not the right problem :) The geo: scheme has its uses, but it shouldn’t condition…

Replying to @dret

…vocabulary modelling when I want to simply capture geo information. It need not be a link when it isn’t meant to be.

Replying to @dret

But it immediately terribly verbose (and with duplicated information to boot, in their example).

Replying to @S_LeGoff

De plein pied dans le Dalloz, ça fait mal aux orteils. *tousse*plain-pied*tousse*
Arguably one of the worst physics jokes I've seen in quite a while.

Replying to @danudey

Look more closely… It is there already. @gf3 @w3c

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

En général, si on peut éviter SMIL c'est pas plus mal :-)

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

Haha :-) Je n'ai pas eu le temps d'essayer, mais apparemment les animations CSS et SVG commencent à bien marcher ensemble.

Replying to @meyerweb

I can only begin to imagine how the past months have been. I am so sorry.

Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d, @nhoizey

En fait ça commence à être utilisé pas si rarement que ça.

Replying to @null and @nhoizey, @rik24d, @JeremiePat

Hmmmmm, il y a quelques projets qu'il faudrait que je sorte de mes (vieux) cartons.

Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d, @nhoizey

Ah oui pour faire du SMIL il faut être un peu kamikaze :-)

Replying to @null and @nhoizey

Évidemment que je m'en souviens, @JeremiePat avait TOUT DÉCHIRÉ! @rik24d

Replying to @null and @divya

I've been wondering if it would be a good idea to translate the manifesto into other languages?

Replying to @null and @divya

I'm happy to do French if you reckon it helps. Who would ask? I don't think it's that US-specific.

Replying to @null and @divya

is it on the github?

Replying to @null and @sgalineau

you're just cynical :-) @divya

Replying to @JeremiePat

Tu penses à un cas d'espèce?

Replying to @JeremiePat

Bah c’est juste «ouais, trop d’accord mec», ou «LOL»!

Replying to @ahopebailie

I don’t know, I always thought that Markdown was a blemish on the face of humankind. If you use <pre> it works, ` is <code>.

Replying to @ahopebailie

Use ``` blocks (I edited the first one).
Comment vous diriez «death by a thousand cuts» en français?

Replying to @Doespirito

Non, ce serait un contre-sens :)

Replying to @Doespirito

Mais qui tue!

Replying to @Doespirito

L’idée est celle d’une mort qui vient à petit feu, par mille blessures, chacune desquelles n’est seule un problème.

Replying to @dontcallmeDOM

Haha. Correct, mais un peu spécialiste :)

Replying to @Doespirito

Merci, mais ça ne fait pas justice au sens de l’expression :)

Replying to @dontcallmeDOM

Disons que j’aimerais que ce soit lisible par des personnes *autres* qu’experts-sadiques :)

Replying to @null and @sploinga

Non non, c’est pas sexuel.

Replying to @Doespirito

Ah, ça s’en rapproche, merci!

Replying to @Keltounet

Il manque un aspect, mais c’est pas mal — merci! @Sniperovitch

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Oui c’est ça. Mais c’est pas loin, ça peut orienter l’inspiration :) @Keltounet

Replying to @Sniperovitch and @Keltounet

Ceci dit, «mort par mille petites coupures» vous trouvez ça compréhensible?

Replying to @Doespirito

Oui j’avais déjà trouvé ça, c’est pas joli joli :) On m’a d’ailleurs suggéré le nom chinois comme traduction.

Replying to @null and @sploinga

La normalisation insidieuse, c’est mon métieur!

Replying to @null and @sploinga

Euh, métier, putain.

Replying to @null and @sploinga

Question bête: si je dis juste «mort par mille petites coupures» tu comprends ou c’est bizarre?

Replying to @vgholkar

Yeah, but it’s missing the thousand cuts!

Replying to @consttype

Merci, mais c’est pas vraiment le sens.

Replying to @vgholkar

That’s more the straw that broke the camel’s back :)

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Hmmm, pour un manifeste féministe on peut faire pire que kung fu ou SM j’imagine. @Keltounet

Replying to @null and @sploinga

Ok, ok. Ceci dit, rien ne tue plus le français que ses défenseurs :)

Replying to @vgholkar

Based on feedback so far I believe there is no correct translation. At this point I’m going literal.
@divya «We keep our heads down working at our jobs(…)» — shouldn’t that be a negative, or «We are tired of»? It reads weird w/ previous sent

Replying to @null and @CheAverell

Non, ça c’est «the straw that broke the camel’s back» :) @Sniperovitch
Demain midi, c’est avec grand plaisir que je présente «Innover avec les Standards du Web» chez mes amis de @spintank berjon.com/presentations/…
↺ 2

Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d

Bien joué mec, bien joué.

Replying to @FremyCompany

Je pense que c’est la version belge (j’aime beaucoup!) :)

Replying to @FremyCompany

C’est beau, je kiffe.
Writing about feminism in a gendered language like French is just insanely hard. I wonder how to change that.

Replying to @cwilso

yes, I do that systematically in English. But it doesn't work so easily in French.

Replying to @tabatkins and @cwilso

You mean like ellez, ilz, je suis venuez?

Replying to @brucel

I guess that would work if I could teach those languages to the French!

Replying to @patrick_h_lauke

Then to find some readers :-)

Replying to @svgeesus

It is if you're translating! Des serviettes pour elle et lui?

Replying to @tobie

Yeah, it's come up on public-webapps :-) @shepazu

Replying to @fantasai

Again, though, as you know it’s not an option in French! @cwilso

Replying to @fantasai

Because both systematic «he» and they-singular sound wrong to my ear. @cwilso

Replying to @fantasai

That’s part of the problem I’m dealing with. What does «we» maps to in a text written by women. Authors or community? @cwilso

Replying to @fantasai

In French, in a number of cases, the gender shows through there and changes the meaning entirely. @cwilso

Replying to @dirkschulze

Because it has an non-negligible impact on the meaning. @fantasai @cwilso

Replying to @svgeesus

It doesn’t, except when it does. Try capturing «Nous sommes descendues» for instance.

Replying to @Enroweb

Pas du tout! Il suffit de regarder James Bond pour voir tout le mal que le CIFRE peut faire!
↺ 1

Replying to @null and @plouga

Ah, so I wasn’t the only one to feel receiving this email was way, way into WTF land. @recifs

Replying to @rubin

C’est pour #663399Becca?
Proposal to name #663399 “Becca Purple” in CSS4 Color discourse.specifiction.org/t/name-663399-… #663399Becca (from @dontcallmeDOM)
↺ 34
"Metamaths", G. Chaitin. Some pretty interesting bits, but also padding.

Replying to @rodneyrehm

what's wrong with TM1? I tried TM2 but they made projects unusable so I gave up.

Replying to @rodneyrehm

TM2 just doesn't support projects at all. You can't have files from 2 disjoint directories in the same window. It's stupid :-(

Replying to @yatil

Heh, thanks :-) Sublime is like Emacs for me, I never even got it to the point where it doesn't look wrong to me! @rodneyrehm

Replying to @rodneyrehm

re the git thing in v1, have you nuked the bundle such that only the parts in "Pristine" remain?
@divya Did you see the pull request?

Replying to @tobie

No worries man, I got a batch of reviews! @divya

Replying to @samsaffron

Thanks, it’s very kind of you to offer! I started it up as an experiment on the min 1Go and got swamped with the #663399 idea.

Replying to @samsaffron

And of course it happened in my sleep. I’ve pushed it up to a more reasonable VM and it seems to be handling better.

Replying to @samsaffron

That’s awfully kind of you, thank you very much! I might take you up on that, I’m not much of an OPS guy :)

Replying to @samsaffron

But I need to mull it over. W3C gets pretty anxious when it doesn’t own its data, and this is sort of W3C-skunkworks :)
The Git Man Page Generator has me just crying with laughter: git-man-page-generator.lokaltog.net
↺ 1
@torgo Do you mind editing discourse.specifiction.org/t/topics-relat… so that it has more meaningful content please? Cool that you started this :)

Replying to @torgo

Anything you want, but if you bring httpRange-14 just keep in mind that I know where you live.
I wonder what people think of adding more entity reference to HTML, as proposed in discourse.specifiction.org/t/add-new-char… ?
↺ 2

Replying to @SimonSapin

That would pretty much be my default response, but maybe there are dev ergonomics that I’m not thinking of, hence the question.

Replying to @null and @m_strehl

Haha, you’re evil. Hey, what if we reused the DOCTYPE somehow to enable declaring new stuff? :)
Adding background blur to CSS? discourse.specifiction.org/t/background-b…

Replying to @null and @divya

No worries, no rush, I just wanted to make sure that it didn’t fall through the cracks :)

Replying to @domenic and @torgo

Maybe packaging as well? @w3ctag
La culture des commentaires, partout. Du feedback sur un "wall" de la #ratp.
↺ 51

Replying to @svgeesus

Don't we already have most of those covered though?
La fête de l'école maternelle restera, en toute instance, la meilleure compagne d'une bonne vieille gueule de bois.

Replying to @matreq

Ah ouais quand même! Tu lâches rien!

Replying to @null and @koalie

thank you so much!

Replying to @null and @madsgraphics

What have I done?

Replying to @null and @madsgraphics

Ah! Tu sais, je n’ai pas fait grand chose :)

Replying to @null and @madsgraphics

Mais je prends les bisous!

Replying to @w3cmemes

Oh, I thought that was for editors.

Replying to @greyjohndowe

Well, the MPAA never infiltrated the @w3c, but it looks like someone led a successful campaign in Unicode. @xor @Falkvinge

Replying to @greyjohndowe

Given that the @w3c has no board, that would be pretty difficult to achieve, even with cheating and bribery. @xor @Falkvinge

Replying to @greyjohndowe

The only link between the tweet you cite and your statement is, sadly, ignorance: berjon.com/blog/2014/01/y… @xor @Falkvinge
OH: «Pour moi, Game of Thrones, c’est la suite de Star Wars.» #woké cc @spintank

Replying to @andrewmcgivery

Well played Bing! Well played truly.

Replying to @greyjohndowe

Not at all. You give the impression that it gives them some form of power or control. It does not. @xor @Falkvinge
Is there a way for admins of a @github org to not get subscribed to all new repos by default? I can’t find the option.
↺ 1

Replying to @yatil

But I want to get notifications when I’m granted push access, just not when it’s automatic through owning an org :) @github

Replying to @yatil

Thanks a lot though!

Replying to @yatil

Which is fine for small orgs, but @w3c is at 89 repos and growing! It gets tedious… @github

Replying to @anthony_ricaud and @rik24d

Almost, except tweets.berjon.com/478918917822627840 (but thanks a lot!) @github

Replying to @AutomatedTester

Not true, I met some @github peeps and they are nice and all! They just want to hug us with lots of email.

Replying to @AutomatedTester

Yeah, I’ve often been thinking that it’d be great to have something other than email for notifications (not just on mobile)

Replying to @AutomatedTester

Or, more like dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-fi… maybe?
Hey @IEDevChat, it's great that you're here! I was wondering if you had plans to share related to github.com/w3c/web-platfo…. Thanks!
↺ 1

Replying to @littlecalculist

of course!

Replying to @littlecalculist

if you wait until I'm in front of a proper computer I can even give you the rights.

Replying to @littlecalculist

It's evening kids crunch time in this TZ, I'll get to it as soon as they're sleeping :-)

Replying to @littlecalculist

You should be able to add one to discourse.specifiction.org/categories now. Please pick a nice colour and give a useful short description!

Replying to @adrianba

Adrian! Hi! I was thinking about plans to run the tests automatically, submit results, etc. @IEDevChat

Replying to @adrianba

There’s a lot of goodness that can be done in that area, so I was wondering if there was anything you could share. @IEDevChat

Replying to @adrianba

That’s all very cool. If there’s anything concrete please announce! Test the web, save the web :) @erikanavara @IEDevChat

Replying to @wilto

wait, where is picture?

Replying to @poulpita

Un hackathon Hello Kitty! J’en rêve!

Replying to @Geographedumond

Que nenni, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep-frie… (mais c’est écossais, plutôt que britannique). @adelaigue
Il faut vivre à @ville_montreuil pour voir un maire PCF, @patricebessac, s’acharner à remettre en cause les acquis du Front Populaire. #wtf

Replying to @jensimmons and @thewebahead

An extra link you might find interesting in that context.

Replying to @NatashaVeen and @natashasixdegs

Yes I have thanks! We’re still looking at what we’ll be doing, will get back to you when I know. @marieforgue @dontcallmeDOM

Replying to @jensimmons

Hmmmm. Mmmm. Yeah, you know what? I kind of did. muleradio.net/thebigwebshow/…

Replying to @briankardell

Yeah, @littlecalculist added it last night :)

Replying to @null and @divya

Yay! :)
La grande lettre ouverte sur le féminisme dans le numérique est désormais disponible en VF: aboutfeminism.me/fr/
↺ 4

Replying to @null and @divya

MUAHAHAHAHA*cough* @dirkschulze

Replying to @null and @pom

I’m pretty sure no one would mind if you grabbed the domain and proxied there :) @divya
The specs on the Fire are interesting (amazon.com/dp/B00EOE0WKQ) but Amazon has been so bad at UI on desktop apps I don’t even want to try it.
Fascinating notions: Eigenmorality scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1820
↺ 1
@Yomguithereal artoo is pretty cool; I was wondering if you’d thought of a version that just injects itself into PhantomJS or the like?
A pretty cool Web scraping library meant to run in the browser: medialab.github.io/artoo/
↺ 3

Replying to @domenic

Hey, maybe we could have a system where the prefix would be bound to a domain? #hehehe @briankardell @stevefaulkner @sideshowbarker

Replying to @briankardell

It strikes me that the time is ripe to bring back SOAP’s genius mustUnderstand att! @domenic @stevefaulkner @sideshowbarker

Replying to @Yomguithereal

sweet, I'd definitely use that a lot! (And a Firebug extension too :-)
@FQXi Is there a good email address at which to send an idea about the community site?

Replying to @FremyCompany

If the community were a bureaucracy then those slippery slope arguments would hold. But we’re not. @LeaVerou

Replying to @FremyCompany

It is absurd to apply notions of fairness and equality to mourning, support, and respect. @LeaVerou

Replying to @FremyCompany

If I applied a slippery slope argument to yours, why not make everyone have the same, standard, bland tombstone? @LeaVerou

Replying to @FremyCompany

Whoa, I think you just broke a new record for the most WTF non-sequitur. @LeaVerou

Replying to @FremyCompany

No, I didn’t, but I’ll accept that maybe you misunderstood. @LeaVerou

Replying to @espadrine

Not my point, though :) I am simply saying that we can provide highly differentiated signs of mourning… @FremyCompany @LeaVerou

Replying to @espadrine

…from person to person, without it being unfair or requiring uniformisation. @FremyCompany @LeaVerou

Replying to @espadrine

Fair enough :) But I think that is overstating the «sacrality» of the platform. @FremyCompany @LeaVerou
Welcome to you <picture> element, I hope you feel at home w3.org/html/wg/drafts…
↺ 54

Replying to @romuleald

Oui?

Replying to @romuleald

Désolé, je ne comprends pas ta question…

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Putain, le bruit que ça fait en bougeant! Classe!

Replying to @romuleald

Tu veux dire en Recommendation? Non, mais c’est plutôt stable

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Ouais balèze! Bon ceci dit dans la série animal de compagnie ça n’a pas l’air top interactif :)

Replying to @null and @marcosc

Yeah, I reckon I’ll just write the tombstone draft for you; that way it’ll be done right :) @wilto

Replying to @null and @marcosc

I’ll make it a Note with a link; not clear a redirect is legit. @wilto

Replying to @Sniperovitch

C’était quoi? J’ai juste tenu un (assez grand) python une fois et c’était surprenamment agréable.

Replying to @null and @marcosc

It will be a fucking empty document with a big link. If people get confused, we’ll have to put them down. @wilto

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Oh, c’est beau! Oui, j’ai trouvé que ça avait le cuir très doux, je ne voulais plus de poser :)

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Niveau musculaire aussi: il s’est tendu de la moitié de sa longueur dans le vide au bout de mon bras. Impressionnant.

Replying to @Sniperovitch

J’espère que tu vas me dire que tu as essayé avec des chatons.

Replying to @null and @marcosc

I reckon the popup is clear enough, no? @wilto

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Tu m’étonnes, aucune chance. J’avais une chatte qui chassait les serpents, mais ils étaient riquiquis.

Replying to @Sniperovitch

RHO putain. C’est parfois dommage qu’il y a un monde d’avant Vine :)

Replying to @yoavweiss

Ah! I *knew* it was staring at me! @wilto @marcosc @zcorpan

Replying to @null and @marcosc

Bah. If it’s that slow, the platform can pre-render it on install and call it a day. @trygve_lie

Replying to @null and @marcosc

Making developers produce 57 variants of the same image is just insane, there’s no excuse for it. @trygve_lie

Replying to @null and @marcosc

Implementations know just the right size to use when set up happens — it’s much easier there. @trygve_lie

Replying to @null and @B_Rasschaert

If that’s your understanding of Web technology, no wonder you think Flash was better.

Replying to @null and @B_Rasschaert

You mean on mobile where Flash was never usable? Yeah, I know how that works.

Replying to @null and @B_Rasschaert

Yes, it had the same annoying limitations everywhere :) I was a Flash developer in a previous life...

Replying to @null and @B_Rasschaert

I can absolutely deny that! Flash always had a horribly painful tool chain.

Replying to @tobie

Sounds like some kind of async factory — not sure it’s smelly.

Replying to @tobie

Oh, yeah, if all they do is help build the object’s internals they shouldn’t show up.

Replying to @tobie

Man, I’m not an architect like you :) Show me the code and maybe I can tell!
Does anyone know who came up with Boltzmann Brains in the first place? I can’t seem to find the origin.

Replying to @tobie

You seem to add addDependency at runtime — why not remove it before making the object available?

Replying to @tobie

:)

Replying to @tobie

There’s another kind of language?

Replying to @tobie

Probably, and if so, then yes.

Replying to @tobie

*ouch*

Replying to @tabatkins

Apparently not, it seems to be a much more recent notion; but my research-fu is failing to narrow it down.

Replying to @tabatkins

Maybe this is precisely the type of reality-dysfunction that shows we actually *are* Boltzmann brains. Or I am. You’re a figment.

Replying to @tabatkins

Smart figment. I’ll buy you some scotch for that next we meet.

Replying to @null and @marcosc

I’d even call it a «tools oughta do their fucking job» situation. But that’s just me, prolly channeling @BrobinBerjon @trygve_lie

Replying to @tabatkins

Thanks a lot, checking it out.

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Hahahahaha.

Replying to @daringfireball

Replying to @Sniperovitch

rien qu'à regarder j'ai peur de me brûler.

Replying to @Sniperovitch

Oui, je préfère les perles à une cloque sur la bite, c'est mon côté mijoré conventionnel.
View from the top of my fridge.
Un job dans une chouette petite startup pour qui veut, Gestion de projet / Développement commercial (junior) 87seconds.com/fr/page/chef-d…
Pretty awesome rap about Net Neutrality, featuring Tim Berners-Lee & Mark Zuckerberg youtube.com/watch?v=MdzeBc…
↺ 2

Replying to @briankardell

You mean 5.0? It only has reasonably interoperable stuff.

Replying to @briankardell

yup indeed.

Thread of 2 tweets

Replying to @null and @koalie

ROFL :)

Replying to @null and @m4d_z

Flatteur, va!

Replying to @null and @m4d_z

Tout me sied le pied, tu es poète ce soir. :-*

Replying to @edasfr

Oui, du coup ma femme est intervenue pour me dégoter des sandales :) @m4d_z

Replying to @cscottnet

Yes, as things evolve there are (temporary) discrepancies. The newer @w3c variant is now in WebKit and Gecko nightlies.

Replying to @cscottnet

What are you trying to implement?
@Spartoo Bonjour, j'ai besoin d'annuler une commande faite en double par erreur et je ne trouve pas le mail de votre service client. Merci!

Replying to @cscottnet

Yes, that is correct. <rb> is used in content, and users have been asking for it.

Replying to @cscottnet

Oh, cool, that’s one Node DOM implementation I haven’t tried. I like what it promises.

Replying to @cscottnet

I don’t believe there’s agreement at this point; as I was saying when evolutions happen there are discrepancies.

Replying to @cscottnet

The intent is that they are temporary (and restricted to cases of impossible-to-resolve disagreement).

Replying to @cscottnet

For a summary of the extensive discussion that lead to the change, see w3.org/TR/ruby-use-ca….

Replying to @cscottnet

Your HTML parser seems fairly typical, I could provide a patch if you want (as for github.com/html5lib/html5…)

Replying to @cscottnet

Replying to @cscottnet

Ok, LMK if you want a patch at some point, I can make time for that!

Replying to @cscottnet

There’s github.com/aredridel/html… but it needs an update.
As gratuitous, useless scientific figures go, this one rates pretty high.
↺ 4

Replying to @fgeorges

That’s why the figure is useless, the text already says the K° is uniform to within parts in 10^5.
Boltzmann Replicators berjon.com/boltzmann-repl… cc @FQXi

Replying to @FremyCompany

Wow, cool. Can you share? @espadrine

Replying to @FremyCompany

Thanks! Can't read it on my phone, will check it out later!

Replying to @philwills and @patrickhamann

Out of curiosity, would you help someone relocate?
Featuring sexy @sideshowbarker inside. "@marcosc: HTML. Serious examples for serious business! pic.twitter.com/LOAzi2O5RV"
↺ 1

Replying to @tabatkins

But there is heat entering the system, in tiny amounts but that can be tapped nevertheless. @FQXi
@m4d_z On me susurre à l’oreille que ça pourrait être ton anniversaire? Gros bisou!

Replying to @schillinger

Ce qui est beau c’est qu’en souhaitant bon anniversaire à @m4d_z, j’ai découvert comment bien orthographier «susurrer».

Replying to @glazou

et réciproquement!

Replying to @tabatkins

I realise the pressure exerted by the surrounding entropy, but it can't exert change faster than the system's energy allows @FQXi

Replying to @tabatkins

I have an idea to show it's possible, but it needs work. Meanwhile I'd be happy to take anything you can throw my way :-) @FQXi

Replying to @versac

Classe ton nouveau picto, je vois que t’es aligné corpo :) @glazou

Replying to @tabatkins

That's where I suspect a counterintuitive loophole. @FQXi

Replying to @versac and @ParisWeb, @glazou

il va falloir que je trouve un tournedos de cheval photogénique.

Replying to @JeremiePat and @mariejulien, @porteneuve, @laut3rry, @kaelig, @schillinger, @kReEsTaL, @oncletom

Je peux prendre cuisine plutôt? La patisserie, bof.

Replying to @JeremiePat and @mariejulien, @porteneuve, @laut3rry, @kaelig, @schillinger, @kReEsTaL, @oncletom

Enfin c’est sympa mais les gens ne veulent que choco
I'm considering writing a business negotiation book predicated solely on doing the opposite of whatever @David_Cameron does.

Replying to @null and @PLOSLabs

Decent support for maths on eInk devices, and the death of pdf with all its nasty issues. @openscience

Replying to @tabatkins

They don't ever leave.
Possibly the most vitally important question I’ve seen asked on GitHub so far. github.com/w3c/Amaya-Edit…
↺ 1
@slightlylate @torgo Are you going to send a note to the AC and AB about this stupid rule? I reckon it’s worth a shot.

Replying to @torgo

I suggest to also point it out to the AC, for good measure. They can add some pressure. @slightlylate

Replying to @null and @PLOSLabs

I have a strong preference for HTML. It can be further specialised for particular needs. @openscience

Replying to @null and @PLOSLabs

Most importantly, it can be made to preserve semantics. It is sad to see so much research be captured without meaning @openscience

Replying to @null and @PLOSLabs

I’d be happy to help if you’re researching this, I’ve been doing similar stuff for technical standards. @openscience