February 2019
174 tweets
Google is using the dominance of Chrome and Android to make a profit from destroying journalism. Together with Apple's iOS they enable Facebook to do more of the same.
Let's not treat this emergency the way we did climate change.
Quoting a tweet by @fmanjoo ↗
♥ 1↺ 1
"When was the last time you thought of the internet as a weird and wonderful place?" A beautiful if sad essay from @violetblue.
How do we turn this tide?
engadget.com/amp/2019/01/31…
♥ 11↺ 8
Sadly it's an ad...
We have a bunch of open data positions, send them our way. nytimes.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/Tech
For all the people jumping in to say "cheesecake", that's made which "cream cheese" which isn't cheese.
♥ 1
Cheesecake is the best cake. Given it's unrelated to cheese I can only assume it was named as a tribute to all that is good and holy.
♥ 1
It isn't matured. French has similar misnomers like fromage blanc. Those can be desserts.
♥ 1
Many years from now we'll look back on this tweet as the moment Twitter jumped the shark. No. Not a pie. It could be a tart but the crust is the wrong kind. And it contains no cheese.
What's next? Pizza from Chicago?
♥ 2
Ricotta is a whey cheese. It's complicated.
♥ 1
I agree that decentralisation of some sort is the way out, I'm just still waiting for it to actually work.
I hope you folks figure it out!
♥ 1
My president is @TheAnnaGat. OK!
Quoting a tweet by @RoseLaoutaris ↗
"We designed a standard to tell advertisers that you're reading an incest/abuse support site, WHO KNEW this could be misused?"
I meant, like, newspapers.
I was half expecting a claim that incest victims too are entitled to a more relevant ad experience, so in a sense I'm relieved.
It takes some deliberate curation but there is plenty to read that won't, and for good reason.
Ragnarok was brilliant. It's hard to top the badassness of @TessaThompson_x, I hope they make Valkyrie movies.
♥ 1
Yes. It's not entirely clear why they make Marvels without her.
♥ 1
Is the Good Life instagrammable?
I spent a while working from home after my first daughter was born, she became accustomed to contributing to regular W3C working group teleconferences, helping lead the Web to its proverbial full potential.
♥ 2
Dungeons & Dogs would be pretty awesome though.
♥ 1
It's not like the other hills, though. If you die on that one, you get a special URN.
Oh yeah. 🎤💧
♥ 2
There are also attempts at interpreting the GDPR as property rights, primarily in the context of the patrimonialisation of personal data. I'm not saying it necessarily holds, but the turf war is here.
I would ask @CT_Bergstrom !
♥ 2
This thread is entirely correct. It is not systematic but not rare either for entire features in MPEG standards to exist simply to bring in someone's patent. ISO rules prohibit this so those discussions just happen outside the room. I know, I've been there.
Quoting a tweet by @enginetankard ↗
♥ 12↺ 9
The manner in which national bodies vote on ISO standards also hurts. Most countries vote "yes" by default when they don't have time to review a standard, and there are lots of standards. Almost nothing gets rejected.
I campaigned to halt a bad ISO standard once, it was hopeless.
♥ 5↺ 2
Subjectivity should, I would think, be context/question-dependent which ML is not good at. Calling it bias reminds us that it's really just glorified statistics and you'd call a bad estimator biased, but subjective?
The difference I have in mind is with respect to the Perspective API. It is used to assess the toxicity of text. If you're text implies that you're a black woman it will rate it more toxic than the same text implying you're a white man. Is it racist?
The answer depends on context. For many comments, it skews against various groups and that's deleterious. But it is correct that toxic comments will use race and gender to be toxic, so the mention does indeed increase the odds that such a comment is toxic.
So it's biased like a tool that always skews one way. For it to be subjective it would have to skew differently depending on context. Does that make sense? It's hard to summarise in tweets.
Come to NYC 😊
Just speculation, but what device/OS is this? Wondering what form of id matching could have taken place.
♥ 1
That fine is a warning shot. If the appeal holds they can issue the same fine every day, and then some. And they can go for remedial action as they did with Vectaury. You're right about consent, but it's not the end of that battle.
"Privacy's Blueprint", by @hartzog. An excellent interweaving of design, privacy, law, tech, and policy; I think you'll find it interesting if you're in any of these fields. I hope this makes it into upcoming regulation.
♥ 8↺ 5
Thank *you*! With all the ongoing discussions about what to put in privacy regulations I feel it's going to prove quite useful!
♥ 1
The tattoo is egregious; the whole thread about how big tech is corrupting law schools is a must-read.
Quoting a tweet by @cagoldberglaw ↗
♥ 24↺ 13
It doesn't quite communicate decency.
♥ 2
Il y a Blendle (launch.blendle.com). À ma connaissance ça ne donne pas des résultats fulgurants, mais bon c’est en beta donc bénéfice du doute.
Pour le micropaiement, techniquement c’est possible et les browsers vont vers ça. Souhaitable est une question plus difficile.
On ne peut pas demander aux gens de payer sans rien donner du contenu — il y a trop de clickbait. Mais pour les news l’intro donne souvent l’essentiel.
Ça peut aussi être difficile de choisir un niveau de prix, pour beaucoup de raison (notamment que tous les articles ne se ressemblent pas, il y a des risques de concurrencer les abonnements, etc.).
@BrobinBerjon Hey, we were talking about you! Haven't heard from you in forever!
♥ 1
Someone at @googlemaps thought it was a good idea to enable random strangers to request your location. By default.
How is it even possible, in such a high-profile app, with such high-sensitivity data, that no one thought this could possibly go wrong?
Quoting a tweet by @LAM_Barrett ↗
♥ 38↺ 41
Lindsey wouldn’t fall for it because she understands privacy and technology. But how many people out there are being stalked as we speak because they had no idea what to do with the notification?
♥ 6
I thought the deep time limit (after which tectonics completely renewed everything on the surface) was 3.5Bya? If tectonics started only 1Bya shouldn’t we potentially have traces all the way to the beginning of life? Fascinating stuff.
♥ 1
Lol, OMG I had no idea it was you!
♥ 3
Sick burn!
Hi Sam, welcome! 🤗❤️
♥ 2
Is there a notable downside to just blocking?
I don't know, it could've hurt the feelings of your sauropod followers?
I agree blocking is heavy in this case, but in my (admittedly limited) experience curation is what makes Twitter usable. At least mute?
OH: "You eat quiche like a Brooklynite."
♥ 6
Isn’t sincerity always defiant?
♥ 1
Yes — I’ve been leading a double life: robertobezjon.com (caught by @beaufour)
♥ 4
I think defiance can be perfectly gentle! It needs resist and disobey, but there is no need to be unkind about it :)
♥ 1
The bus stop is impressive though.
This article has made me wonder all weekend: has anyone sketched out details of re-insecting the world to prevent insect-driven collapse of the entire food web? Maybe some entomophagy research could provide some useful pointers?
theguardian.com/environment/20…
♥ 1
Any tool you particularly like for drawing causal diagrams? Accepting a simple textual format as input is a plus.
♥ 1
*stares*
Thanks! Checking it out.
So, it doesn’t seem to support causal graphs out of the box. Am I missing an option or do you just repurpose some of the UML diagrams?
Thanks, I'll see if that works best for me. Another option was to try to load Dagitty a JS lib and to see if I could massage the output, but it's not really modern JS...
Wait. But what if I play Devil's Advocate *for the purpose of delivering you a more relevant ad experience*.
♥ 6
If it only put the owner at risk... but it brings about a regime in which lying is fraud and silence suspect. Being paid for data is an idea whose time has come to be buried in the woods and not spoken of again.
♥ 3
This is not an unfungible natural resource. It's not a dividend. @GavinNewsom just invented taxation.
♥ 3
Don't get me wrong though. Taxing Big Tech at levels comparable with their actual income would be a very good idea.
♥ 1
Ici on a "Parent / Guardian 1" depuis un bail (prenant en compte *aussi* le fait que certains s'occupent d'enfants sans être parent) mais tu peux les mettre dans l'ordre que tu veux, s'il y a un prénom féminin c'est le premier appel...
Maybe the worst part is that I don’t even know how much you could make if you’re already underpriv’d. Data is largely valued in proportion to what you can sell against it — data of people who can’t buy much would only sell so well. It sure would make the rich instantly richer!
What worries me most is the closeted gay kid in high school on whatever social media en vogue that asks for orientation. Either they don’t say and that’s a tell, or they lie and that’s fraud.
J'adore le diagramme!
Carrément!
Do you know if that diagram could be made available as a wall poster? Cc @geoffdelc @versac
♥ 4
I dropped out of philosophy and that's about all the formal education I got. The philosophy has actually come in useful to work in an industry that has all the accountability of a beheaded chicken. 🐔
Quoting a tweet by @lindydonna ↗
♥ 17
My 9yo is writing a report on Beyoncé but she won't believe Jay-Z is pronounced "Jay-Zed". Please send evidence.
♥ 5
Oh yeah.
Indeed!
Jay-Zed!
Faut-il qu'ils soient vraiment cons pour réussir à me mettre du côté de Finkielkraut...
Je doute qu'il n'en apprenne quoi que ce soit...
♥ 1
It doesn't kill so much as millimpede it.
♥ 1
Is New Mexico snow always little snowballs falling from the sky or is that special for me?
♥ 2
Thankfully it's giving you a choice in the matter.
♥ 1
I was being ironic 😏 I think it would be quite interesting to poke under the hood to see what it does with that.
♥ 5
The closer it gets to dystopia the harder it is to tell who has just accepted the situation.
♥ 8
The Breaker Upperers was lit!
♥ 3
How far is it from Santa Fe?
I am! It's great!
If I showed up at @sfiscience in the morning and started typing away on my laptop, do you think anyone would notice and kick me out? 😏🙄
♥ 8
And I can't seem to find it anywhere on the site!
I look forward to @dwallacewells's book. In the meantime, here's a sobering taste.
It's encouraging to see Celsius used in The Times, though. Change is possible!
nytimes.com/2019/02/16/opi…
♥ 3
I use historical models of food web disruptions to try to predict the effect of switching from personal data to contextual data in Internet-wide open auction programmatic systems. Might I fake my way to the coffee machine?😁
♥ 3
Love both, but I prefer Marmite which one of these days might lose me my Australian citizenship.
♥ 2
If they still make it I highly recommend Cadbury's Vegemite chocolate 🍫.
Lol. We can't even get articles published with statically meaningful semantics. Or anything accessible, machine-readable...
Inevitable sooner.
Of course, of course, you couldn't pull this off without some sensible opsec 🕵️♂️
♥ 1
Today in Facebook Sucks: profiting from a public health crisis.
Quoting a tweet by @juliacarriew ↗
♥ 1
I second Breaker Upperers.
♥ 1
Actually, I think it was designed to punk people but then became a sensation 😋
adnews.com.au/news/mondelez-…
♥ 1
Yay! Thanks, I'll be sure to drop by next time I'm in town.
♥ 1
It's a draft feature.
♥ 1
I'd be curious to hear a while from now if you managed to nail it down and it stuck. When I was consulting it seemed that every time I felt I had a clear description of my offering a new client would come along asking for something that didn't fit.
Consent to open programmatic advertising is the roofie of legal bases. The interesting hidden story here is that these documents make it clear that @IABEurope offered it as a solution to publishers in evident bad faith.
Quoting a tweet by @OpenRightsGroup ↗
♥ 8↺ 11
The most surprising thing in this story is that there are people out there who still believe there's any brand safety in advertising on YouTube.
Quoting a tweet by @nytmedia ↗
♥ 6↺ 2
A lot of these are old. Maybe the boring ones survived?
♥ 1
Maybe just a form of selection, boring can be reliable!
True! There was money in it back then, especially after 1833 when the ad-based model was invented.
HAHAHA! Don't worry, I feel pretty removed from the initial naming decision 😏
♥ 1
DO IT.
Ha, same. Sometimes I do wonder if it's such a good idea, though 😏
I've tried, but frankly I don't think I'll ever get British humour. Take this Brexit thing: they've been going on about it for how long now? Still not funny. It's not very credible anyone would do something that stupid to boot.
Maybe time to move on to the next joke?
♥ 2
Open question: if we make it simply illegal for a data controller to pass data on to another data controller, does anything valuable actually break?
♥ 10↺ 3
Please detail! I would expect decentralised apps to remain under the controllership of the user.
You can pass on the data as processors. Ask Mastodon to publish for you but not make any secondary use of the data, and same for everyone downstream. There is no reason that they must use data for their own purposes.
That's a good case to look at. Give me one good reason for those to be data controllers as opposed to acting entirely under user direction!
I assume that data subjects could be able to pass their data to a controller, otherwise there would be no personal data whatsoever!
I'm not sure I follow?
Here is a simple intro: ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-t…
Good point! I feel that legal and medical are two areas that could relatively easily (in the sense that they're already regulated) have some sort of Article 40/regulator-approved boundaries for this sharing.
How do you handle Article 14?
Indeed, but I feel that medical is an area that could relatively easily (in the sense that it's already regulated) have some sort of Article 40/regulator-approved boundaries for this sharing.
Care to develop? I'm not sure I follow.
I don't understand how those deal in personal data?
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean here? How does that create a problem?
You mean like survey providers? Is there any reason those can't be just data processors?
You could, but that's where things would get illegal!
I mean on any basis whatsoever, except as allowed through an Article 40 set of rules approved by regulators. People have listed a few but not that many. Also, portability is user-mediated, it's not really a controller to controller exchange.
Sorry but I still don't see how that's an objection. Do you have an example?
A bunch of countries seem to be doing fine without, and people don't pay their utilities in advance, that's madness.
I'm pretty sure you wouldn't put the whiskers under the nose!
♥ 1
Aren't those separate processings anyway?
You don't need to know the implementation details in order for them to be a processor. The key item is that they cannot use the data for their own secondary purposes.
I just don't put the French system which is about preventing fraud, checking that banks don't carry out unethical lending, and getting people out of excess debt in the same box as the US system which is about controlling people and incentives to spend money you don't have.
The question "what breaks" is about finding which exemptions are needed. I can find a good exemption regime for the French system, US credit bureaus can die gaping for air.
The problem with better enforcement is that it has the wrong cost structure. The onus is entirely on complaints and regulators. I think the valid cases for controller to controller exchange are rare enough that we could flip it. Can't until it's proven needed and safe.
Not any data between entities that happen to have been controllers at some point! Of the same data in a given processing.
If they are controllers they can read your email. They could mine it for all sorts of other uses. It's often an unclear line in the middle, but you generally don't want your email controlled by someone else.
You could absolutely *ask* them to give you more relevant ads. Right now you don't.
Ah, I'd forgotten about that (not a piece I need much). Makes total sense, thanks!
♥ 1
Nope, in fact it is common for processors to require subprocessors, eg. for hosting.
Ha! Excellent naming!
♥ 1
It's a fine thing to be pedantic programmers but that's not how the law works! The fiduciary line lacks critique, we're only now starting to poke at it for issues. I'm not sure it'll hold up to the light, we'll see.
You might be right. The goal in asking "what breaks" is to take the simplest approach and to see what needs to be added for it to work. Indeed I suspect outlawing it for LI and consent may suffice (though I can see @IABEurope coming up with a contract framework!).
I believe they shouldn't be, but it depends on what they do with your data. If they mine it to profile you and sell that, definitely. I don't think the primary concern w have is with email though.
It's *good* Sir Robin.
Pretty much!
Is there a good “How The Web Works” book/article/course that is suitable for smart people willing to work through the complexities but who aren’t interested in actually learning how to code?
I keep having to explain bits and pieces of this, it seems like it would be useful.
♥ 15↺ 4
Those are good for Web architects, but they won’t tell you things like “this is what the HTTP protocol does” or “here is how cookies work”.
Yes, that has a lot of useful detail and is a great resource, but at the same time I don’t need all the first bits and a fair bit more detail about HTTP and browser stuff!
Yes, that’s a wonderful article and I am definitely sharing it with some of those folks, but it doesn’t solve the heart of my issue :)
Yeah, I was afraid someone would say that.
I’m looking for something about how the Web works at the operational level (ie what happens when a user directs their browser to a site). I wish people asked me more about Web governance, but they don’t know it exists ;) But this looks like a good read all the same, thanks a lot!
♥ 1
No, more about what happens at the HTTP level, what is involved in loading, processing, rendering a page, etc.
♥ 1
Oooh, thanks! That’s not obvious from the summary. I’ll grab it to take a look!
♥ 1
Really? How so?
The two suggestions so far have been twitter.com/MarechalPhD/st… which I intend to check out and “you should write it” which… oh dear god.
But is that the level that would enable a lawyer, a journalist, a data engineer, an executive, etc. to get how it all hangs together?
Not the history as in Weaving, more of a view of all fits together. Architecture but without cryptic bits. Enough to speak intelligently on the topic but not to make a website.
♥ 1
Thanks, I'll check it out!
♥ 1
“Third-Party Data Is A Bad Habit We Need To Kick” — Kendell Timmers is VP Advertising Data at @nytimes, I think you’ll want to read what she has to say.
adexchanger.com/the-sell-sider…
Thanks, that’s really helpful!
♥ 1
That’s a good one I hadn’t seen before, thanks!
♥ 1
I hadn’t thought of that one but it actually works — thanks!
I don’t think that that will work for the audience I have in mind (you might know them :) but it looks like a good resource, thanks!
I love how you can’t log into @SSRN unless you disable tracking protection… I guess they’re skeptical of their own fiduciary status.
Thanks for the link!
♥ 1
"The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming", by @dwallacewells. This may be the most sobering book I've read (and I enjoyed Jude the Obscure); I think you should read it too. It's worse than you think and sooner than you think, but we can also do more than you think.
♥ 1
To be precise, it’s too much for experts or masochists too; though it’s in reach for some masochistic experts or expert masochists.
♥ 3








