Replying to @ElieSl
Pareil pour nous, et les banques sont parmi les pires. Aussi, la CAF.
July 2017
378 tweets
Any recommendations for a science / philosophy podcast (or any audio), not wishy-washy? I'm considering running but the boredom looms heavy.
♥ 2↺ 1
Replying to @rubin
Mec, c'est une question sérieuse :-)
Replying to @rubin
Oh, hmm. C'est à dire qu'il est assez loin de la recherche contemporaine, limite anti-philo, et très pop. Je cherche plus hard :-)
Replying to @andreisambra and @slashdeiu
Thanks, will check!
"Cosmopolitism - Ethics in a World of Strangers", @KAnthonyAppiah. Excellent read on a topic of pressing importance.
↺ 1
For those scared at the mention of "ethics": this is thinking written with such clarity that all could, and in this case should, read it.
Replying to @edasfr
Ça fait un bout de temps que j'en parle, donc yes. J'ai déjà fait une installation à l'époque pour @specifiction, je peux m'y coller.
Replying to @null and @Floppy
/me points at the people in the little blue birdie thing.
Replying to @null and @SimonDeDeo
Logic of Science is great, but I don't know if I'd recommend that as the learning step. It's pretty steep. For beginners, Morin's?
Replying to @null and @SimonDeDeo
Oh, I don't in the least deny that, but I can easily imagine how one would get stuck trying to read it in order as an intro. 🙄
Please tell me robotics labs elsewhere in the world are fighting it off to invite them.
Quoting a tweet by @LibyaLiberty ↗
♥ 7↺ 2
Fight the policies folks, but forget the tweets.
♥ 3
The time you spend yelling at a gif is time the GOP can use to pass policy for whoever bribed them this week.
♥ 4↺ 1
Every time they see you railing at a tweet, his base feels they're sticking it to you. Stop, and he's just an angry old pervert.
♥ 2
Trump is desperate, his presidency is running out of wheels to lose. Don’t give him the victory of attention. Fight where you can win.
♥ 1
We should have a safe word of sorts for that, when we see each other wasting time on his distractions.
Like #DontFeedTheLoser.
C’est marrant, j’aurais plutôt pensé que c’est la France Insoumise qui bloque tout à gauche. lemonde.fr/la-france-inso…
♥ 1
Replying to @edasfr
Bon, mais du coup je monte le Discourse?
Replying to @edasfr
Un mini-groupe de confiance en admins, et pour le reste on organise à la volée. Je pense que simplicité est vertu dans ce domaine.
Replying to @edasfr
Franchement, je ne suis pas sûr. Le plus gros problème sera à priori le décollage. Et avec Discourse le bruit se gère.
Replying to @edasfr
Oui, ma motivation est aussi d'éviter de trop débattre du comment, erreur déjà faite :-)
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Mais ND can m'a toujours paru très démocratie directe, non? Avec plein de règles genre pas de représentation dans les médias, etc.?
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Le but c'est penser mieux ensemble. Le tournant habermasien est plus proche qu'il y a même peu de temps. Je veux tenter.
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Oui, ou comme plus généralement compris: trainer au café avec des gens intéressants :-)
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Tout à fait. La plupart des nouveaux mouvements se sont concentrés sur de nvx modes de décision. Ma thèse est que ce n'est pas le problème.
I hadn’t seen that when it came out. Absolutely made my day. thewritelife.com/is-the-oxford-…
♥ 5
Replying to @PushFire
No worries! Didn’t affect me beyond a few weird errors, glad you could get it fixed!
♥ 1
Replying to @msantolini and @XquaInTheMoon
Ok, thanks! I’ll check it out.
Replying to @null and @SimonDeDeo
To what degree does the field (or process) crumble if you stop assuming universality?
Replying to @null and @SimonDeDeo
But isn’t it precisely that (here, useful) fiction that in part defines a field’s culture? And then leads to the consequences you list?
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Exactement! C’est pour ça que je suis favorable à tenter une approche JFDI :)
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Mais parfois ça prend, surtout avec les bonnes graines. Et si ça ne marche pas, tu n'as pas perdu de temps en process méta!
Replying to @WKCosmo and @SimonDeDeo
In + to Simon's excellent points, I would contend that the universal assumption (at least cislunar) was in physics long before testability.
It may be too much of a historical perspective, but 25 centuries of assuming universality might just produce the conceptual tools and...
...attitude that supports intersubjective complexity, whereas other domains have a far more parochial history, at least until recently.
Replying to @null and @SimonDeDeo, @WKCosmo
"It works" is enough for chess, though. At some point you win or you don't.
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
Ben voilà tu viens de répondre à ta question, non? 😇
Replying to @edasfr and @pdwn
Ah ben non! On parle de comment ça se passe en général — c’est du métaméta. Suis un peu Éric, bordel!
Replying to @edasfr
Physicien. Philosophe. Politique. Écrivain. Justicier masqué.
C’était pas déjà dans la #DPG de Jospin ça?
Quoting a tweet by @EPhilippePM ↗
Replying to @webaaz and @edasfr
Au moins trois de ceux-là, j'y compte bien!
Replying to @webaaz and @edasfr
Ben si tu veux pas avoir trop honte...
Replying to @domenic
US plugs indeed are massive safety hazards, but most of the advantages listed are found in EU plugs.
♥ 2
I thought the advantage of UK plugs was that in case of invasion every household is heavily armed. Can't fuck with someone shaking those.
♥ 2
Replying to @CT_Bergstrom and @FrontNeurol
With some pixie dust we could use links that reference to a specific statement instead of the whole paper. It would make what's cited clear.
♥ 1
There are barriers to that. Chiefly that the HTML version would have to be canonical, and PDF dropped (or made very secondary).
♥ 1
I doubt this specific problem is enough to motivate that transition, even if other domains have already done it.
♥ 1
Une question ceci dit pour @valeriomotta: ne peut-on pas voir dans la continuité candidat->PR un moyen de marquer la tenue des engagements?
Replying to @versac and @valeriomotta
J'y serai ai pensé aussi, mais avec ça tu ne peux pas faire le cacou sur les twitters.
Replying to @valeriomotta
Sans présumer de ce qu'il fera, la continuité campagne -> présidence ne me gêne pas autant que l'inverse. J'y vois un sens défendable.
Replying to @valeriomotta
Parler de subliminal, n'est-ce pas déjà faire un procès d'intention?
Replying to @valeriomotta
…soit le voir comme une image de parti plutôt que d’engagement dénote d’une vision de l’organisation politique aujourd’hui dépassée? 🙃
Replying to @null and @helenvholmes
It has occurred to me that writing a lib to manipulate its file format directly might be easier than understanding its UI.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @helenvholmes
Oh yeah, that’s just the «to infinitAAAAAAAy and beyond!!!» button.
♥ 1
Replying to @valeriomotta
Ça peut être l’un ou l’autre, il n’y a pas de primauté ontique à l’un ou l’autre! Décider que ça *doit* être l’un est un parti pris.
♥ 1
Replying to @valeriomotta
Certes, ms je pense que tu aurais justement peine à faire valoir qu’il y a un lien matériel suffisant pr constituer un financement illégal…
Replying to @edasfr and @pdwn
Lol. Non, j'espère faire une install cette semaine, au pire la prochaine.
Replying to @domenic
I wonder if a sizeable chunk of that is a service or library being stupid. Eg. an ad network.
♥ 1
I’m considering attending just to meet some time travellers from the future who’ve come to save the world.
Quoting a tweet by @GTheraulaz ↗
♥ 19↺ 6
Replying to @GTheraulaz
I’d love to, but Toulouse is a bit far. I’d have to find a job in a relevant domain first (which would be cool!)
♥ 1
Replying to @mtsw
Well, I mean he’s called «Iron Stache» and is going against Ryan. If it were legal I would just throw my money at this guy.
Replying to @mtsw and @dccc
Wait, that’s not a parody?
Replying to @mtsw and @dccc
You had me scared — albeit in a credible way — there.
Replying to @tabatkins
Oh, sure — all the more reason to go watch our Swarm Suzerain fry their lowly human arses with their own explosives!
Replying to @domenic
Have you seen the follow-up discussion on discuss.httparchive.org/t/pwa-analysis… ? It looks like it’s possible Google could help a *lot* here.
♥ 2
Replying to @jevakallio and @stshank
Funny, that's been exactly my thinking. And yeah, fuck it's hard.
♥ 1
Replying to @LeaVerou
You need to mansplain back! "Well actually, 10-20 years is baby time at the Web's timescales."
Replying to @yoavweiss and @johnallsopp
The ten-foot spiders are vegetarian, it's the dropbears raining down you ought to worry about.
♥ 2
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Haven't looked at the code in a long time, but how can the base runner take up half a sec but inlines only 16ms?
Browsers used to be so slow at the kind of text node stuff inlines does I had to display-none the body so it wouldn't take 20s.
Replying to @null and @marcosc
Ah! Of course.
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
Because the set of conceptual models that sustain it are relatively unusual, poorly documented, there poorly understood?
Replying to @erikphoel and @SimonDeDeo
It’s almost like you’re saying that an entity is a process with a (relatively) well-defined boundary. 🙃
♥ 1
Replying to @pdwn and @edasfr
C’est trop sur de la production de texte — peut-être plus tard si on en arrive là!
@SwiftKey Can you please get rid of the wasted space at the top-right of the keyboard and make larger completion buttons? It'd be great!
Replying to @erikphoel and @SimonDeDeo
Oh. I thought that was called economics.
Replying to @SpringerNature and @skdh, @sciam
I thought this was going to be like delish.com/cooking/recipe… 🤔
Replying to @dginev
I’m curious about how PDF stores ligatures — clearly, that’s the source of many of those problems. I’m afraid to look, though…
@adafruit Hi! Given your jobs board is offline, is there someone to contact in the meantime? Thanks!
Replying to @ayymanduh and @Floppy, @ODIHQ
I can’t believe it’s been 5 years already! Happy birthday all!
♥ 1
Replying to @edasfr and @PascaleLC
Il y a le marcel.
Replying to @edasfr and @PascaleLC
Allons, allons, en mode le mot "jamais" n'a aucun sens!
Replying to @edasfr and @PascaleLC
Voyons! Ça se fait même à l'ONU!
Replying to @edasfr and @PascaleLC
J’approuve à fond! J’en veux un!
Looks to me like Facebook's debugging tool could use some, erm, debugging.
♥ 1
Replying to @kosamari
Just never forget that those aren't rungs up a ladder and it's always fine to go back to steps two or three :-)
Replying to @yoavweiss and @kosamari
Yes. Not just for beginners, too. I've advocated for it a few times, but it's extra work and not normative so it rarely happens.
Also, when the text goes in it often seems obvious to those involved... who might forget not long later.
Back in ancient history, @timbray had made an annotated XML spec with that kind of information. It might be good to generalise that.
Replying to @gsnedders
There should be a name for that position. Maybe just "reality-based".
Replying to @null and @Floppy
Oh man! We need this!
Replying to @jonty and @pezholio, @Floppy, @pikesley
Not enough machine learning.
Replying to @gsnedders
That’s absurd… Two things can kill it: legal system change, or business strong-arming (as with Apple/Amazon).
Replying to @gsnedders
It doesn’t. That said, I don’t know if you want to enter the fray. Some DRM opponents are really nasty, using words like «corporate whore»…
Replying to @gsnedders
Yeah, I’m not saying you haven’t seen it before, just reminding you that it’s not necessarily a fun occupation :)
Replying to @gsnedders
They have a variety of positions. I think there’s still too much competition between outlets for them to force their way.
Replying to @gsnedders
Part of the problem, which is different from music, is that the new big ones are both producers and distributers. Clashes inside.
Replying to @gsnedders
Yeah, but the global market is trend-setting there.
Replying to @jonty and @pezholio, @Floppy, @pikesley
If you expose this as a SOAP endpoint with built-in data science reporting, I'm sold.
So... when do we ship?
Replying to @jonty and @pezholio, @Floppy, @pikesley
ōver
But you need the ō. Yes, even on the command line.
Replying to @torgo and @jaffathecake, @mathias, @samsunginternet
Arguably, the British should offer a "Fake it" option.
♥ 1
Replying to @torgo and @jaffathecake, @mathias, @samsunginternet
The browser for fuck's sake. Though admittedly the British could fake it too.
♥ 1
Many great points from Ben. But unsure why he expected @w3c to win a negotiation after Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Mozilla already caved.
Quoting a tweet by @benadida ↗
♥ 6↺ 7
Replying to @fabricedesre and @w3c
I agree there is value in a stance, I'm less sure that @w3c is well placed to drive it. I've argued for a community-led covenant a few times
♥ 1
Replying to @benadida and @w3c
But you don't get a covenant involving legal departments without serious leverage. That basically vanished when the API shipped.
Replying to @jonty and @pezholio, @Floppy, @pikesley
Yes, it would save on paper costs.
Replying to @AmeliasBrain and @AirFranceFR
Oh yeah, where they started from is great. Then someone said "we should make it distinctively Air France!" and it all went to shit :-)
♥ 1
Replying to @TheLarkInn
For me it's not so much context switching as losing the stack. Beyond three such interruptions I hit pause and ask to make a list :-)
♥ 3
This is why the real purpose of comments is to document not the code you've written, but that which you haven't written yet.
Quoting a tweet by @marcos_placona ↗
♥ 2↺ 3
Replying to @TheLarkInn
Also, I’ve found that it’s not rude when someone interrupts to ask for ten seconds, then use that time to dump your brain state.
♥ 7
Replying to @TheLarkInn
YMMV but I find that 1) it makes me no longer stressed to drop the thing, 2) I can then pay better attention to what the person asks,
♥ 1
Replying to @TheLarkInn
3) people (esp. spouses :) are understanding, and 4) swapping the state back in can get pretty fast.
Just my 2¢!
♥ 2
Replying to @SteveSyfuhs and @ericlaw
Ha! I wish I could bring it down to where it still shows the number!
Replying to @jwajsberg and @w3c
Well, I think that useful acts are better than symbolic gestures that change nothing, but I know it's not always seen that way :-)
Replying to @edasfr
Tu pourrais pas juste répondre "ok, mais d'abord trouvez lui qui un nom moins ridicule"?
Replying to @tabatkins and @brucel
Can't count the times I've wished this'd work.
I love how there's a "D" on the demon, you know, in case it wasn't clear. 👹
Quoting a tweet by @physorg_com ↗
I’m looking for my next adventure. If you’re interested, you know where to find me!
cv.berjon.com
♥ 11↺ 25
Replying to @yoavweiss
I hope to, at least until summer 2018 to avoid a brutal move for the kids. But I’m open to talking about options!
♥ 1
Replying to @edasfr
Merci Éric :)
Replying to @edasfr
Hahahahaha, bien joué :-D
Replying to @trekonomics
I was in a UK/FR dual-programme high school; the view I got from the French side was a lot short of critical — from leftist teachers too!
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
What are you doing reading those old things?
Man, that font was such a bad idea :)
Replying to @jensimmons
Hear, hear. Fail fast is how to research a feature, not how to drive a product...
♥ 1
Replying to @cepcam
C'est une des raisons pour lesquelles je n'ai que peu accroché à Ruby, alors que le langage est cool. La communauté fait tout en vidéo.
When a friend suggests you go live like him in the Caribbean and remote from there. youtube.com/watch?v=GZqGQl…
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @Floppy, @OverEngConf
«Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to refactor, but when there is no further feature you can think of.»
A de St-Exaspéry
Replying to @lara_hogan
Ooh, cool! Thanks for the tip :)
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
I’d be curious to hear why!
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
I’m not convinced state-of-the-art XML parsers are faster than the state-of-the-art HTML parsers, and if they are I doubt it matters often!
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
Styleable XML never worked; you could never do links and a bunch of other useful things like that. HTML can be deeply semantic, too.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
Halt-and-catch-fire is only a benefit to lazy developers. It actively hurts end users (who get something broken they can do nothing about).
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
It’s the opposite: XML devs are lazy, they want things to blow up without testing. But it doesn’t work, it just hurts others :)
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
HTML === styleable XML with semantics :˜)
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
I’ve been there man. But the HTML options tend to have much better DOM implementations, so I decided to be stubborn about something else :)
Replying to @null and @siilime, @JiminyPan, @dauwhe
And life is so short!
Replying to @null and @dauwhe, @siilime, @JiminyPan
I don’t /> but I close plenty of implieds, and quote all but boolean attributes. It’s just that I don’t want to think.
Replying to @null and @siilime, @dauwhe, @JiminyPan
Except of course… all you need to type is `async` :-}
Replying to @null and @siilime, @dauwhe, @JiminyPan
Still valid, just useless.
And the English language, you know, it’s awesome :)
Replying to @null and @siilime, @dauwhe, @JiminyPan
No, not that far.
Are you talking about the same Finnish for which people can’t even agree on whether there are 14 or 16 cases?
Replying to @null and @dauwhe, @siilime, @JiminyPan
I wish more XML toolchains just took HTML as input. It’s useful, it’s easy, and it’s well-defined.
♥ 1↺ 1
Replying to @null and @prushforth, @dauwhe
Actually, it should. If a publication is a composite resource, pointing to one of its subresources should probably not load the whole thing.
♥ 1
Replying to @ElieSl and @n1k0
Merci :-)
Replying to @ThierryStoehr
Merci Thierry!
Replying to @kevinschawinski and @seanmcarroll
Clearly it must be because they want you on that job.
Replying to @edasfr and @pdwn
Ok, merci, je checke.
Replying to @edasfr and @pdwn
Je pense que c’est réglé pour les deux. Je te mets admin :)
Brexit likely to lead to more expensive beer (oh, and other products).
C’mon. It’s still time to call this off.
economist.com/news/britain/2…
♥ 2↺ 2
Replying to @edasfr
Hahahaha, petit plaisantin!
OMG, those are so good. I’ve only been waiting for this since the Dawn of the Web. Thank you V8 team!
Quoting a tweet by @mathias ↗
♥ 2
@dontcallmeDOM Ha, je t’ai vu! Pour ta peine: BAM, administrateur :)
♥ 1
Un projet qui aide réellement, au quotidien, à la transition énergétique.
Allez les soutenir, bordel!
Quoting a tweet by @ElliotLepers ↗
♥ 1
Replying to @edasfr
Moi aussi! Pas à 100%, il y a toujours la place de faire mieux, mais très largement positifs.
Et c’est marqué «libéral» sur ma tronche.
↺ 1
Replying to @heydonworks and @zeldman
That's why they're profitable. But you can't get there if no one uses your service to start with.
Replying to @heydonworks and @zeldman
Sure, but I don't think that speaks to the original point!
Replying to @temptoetiam and @parisfr
Replying to @dr_l_alexandre
Le sens critique, ça commence par comprendre ce dont on parle avant de l'ouvrir.
♥ 3
Replying to @poulpita
Merci Virginie!
Replying to @le_hasard
Tu nous fais une vidéo?
Replying to @LogicalAnalysis
Really? Where? It's a lot cheaper in Paris than in NYC...
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je ne dis pas qu'on ne peut pas parvenir à une conclusion similaire, mais pas en racontant n'importe quoi sur les AIs ou HTML.
♥ 2
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je répondrai plus long, mais "I could not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presented danger, the solution was ignorance." Asimov
♥ 4
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
L'algorithmique est le point de départ des sciences de la complexité. Quand 50% votent simpliste, on peut hésiter sur cette ignorance.
♥ 4↺ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je ne parle pas de devenir codeur, on peut démontrer une AI correcte en 50 lignes de code. Démystifier le nouveau quotidien, pas inutile.
There should be a literary game in which you write a story from a given @TheBJPS article title.
Dibs on "Counterfactual Desirability"!
♥ 4↺ 1
Replying to @TheBJPS
I almost went with that one! I wish you’d mentioned the wombat on the cover.
♥ 1
Tomorrow, I’ll be speaking at #eprdctn about how to get useful data out of horrible formats. Moby Dick inside! ti.to/wileylabs/2017…
♥ 1
Replying to @benwerd and @natematias
Be that as it may, you did say Marmite escargot 🐌. Those who of us both French and Australian enough to eat Cadbury Vegemite need to know.
Replying to @erikphoel and @TheBJPS
That's a great choice as well! Haven't read it yet; with luck, it too may have a wombat.
♥ 1
Replying to @sapinker
The linked diaeresis article explains why, too :-)
Replying to @ElieSl
Méfie toi, mouvement social en vue (selon tes dates).
Replying to @versac and @gouvernementFR
Lisibles tout court, niveau accessibilité c'est en-dessous de tout...
'murica!
♥ 2
"Sine paenitentia rudi modo ne intraveritis."
The new motto for standards. Cc @dauwhe
♥ 1
@dauwhe This is the most accurate technical summary of http-range-14: berjon.com/http-range-14/
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Le rapport au vote est une incapacité endémique à saisir la complexité.
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Pédant? Peut-être. Ma propre science est la philosophie — il a pu arriver que nous soyons accusé de ça…
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
C’est bien ce que je dis — il ne s’agit pas d’apprendre à développer, qui est de toute façon un artisanat. Mais une question de fondamentaux
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Exemple: j’ai appris la logique avant le code. Je peux dire que, pédagogiquement, c’est beaucoup plus clair en code qu’en notation!
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je vois l’intérêt principal du code comme une projection pédagogique simple et concrète de concepts difficiles et abstraits.
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Le fait de pouvoir intervenir, manipuler est essentiel. C’est un outil de pensée critique puissant que de saisir l’abstrait littéralement.
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
La complexité biologique du point de vue métaphysique et du point de vue d’un automate cellulaire ne sont pas les mêmes!
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je… ne crois pas que je sois en train de mépriser quoi que ce soit…
Replying to @gabriel_mathy and @trekonomics, @HuffPostPol
Well it’s like when that vulgar, noisy uncle comes to town. Can’t take him to the good places where he’ll embarrass you.
♥ 3
Replying to @trekonomics and @gabriel_mathy, @HuffPostPol
I hadn’t realised this, but Trump would have paired up so damn fucking well with Sarkozy.
♥ 3
Replying to @trekonomics and @gabriel_mathy, @HuffPostPol
Sure… but think of the Gaddafi-Putin meetings we could’ve had!
♥ 2
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
J’ai toujours pensé que le programme de L avec mathématiques du citoyen et probas de base était meilleur que les options plus «avancées».
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
L’enseignement des maths (en tout cas tel que je l’ai connu) est strictement inutile, au quotidien, intellectuellement, et pour la science.
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Mais pourquoi enseigner le principe d’une boucle de façon non manipulable plutôt que manipulable? C’est juste de la pédagogie.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Personne ne parle de XML; ça c’est juste pour les artisans.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Je ne crois pas que tu dises quelque chose de très différent de ce que je dis, j’ai juste une vision pédagogique axée sur le faire :)
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Pour moi, absolument pas. Je n’ai compris le sens des maths de lycée qu’en étudiant Leibniz…
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @borisschapira, @dr_l_alexandre
Il y a d’ailleurs beaucoup dans le cursus de philo qui m’ont ouvert au code; en maths, je pense rien. Et pourtant j’aime bien!
♥ 1
Replying to @dginev
Perl was built on classic quotes.
A Daft Punk medley to close a military march, full with drone views, hand-clapping generals, Trump, Macron…
Quoting a tweet by @franceinfo ↗
♥ 2↺ 2
Replying to @TzviyaSiegman and @liza
I don’t know! Whenever we are next in the same geographic area maybe?
Replying to @liza and @TzviyaSiegman
Ha! I will probably be in Boston a couple of days next week — schedule uncertain. Let’s see how this lines up!
♥ 1
Replying to @hadleybeeman
Is it possible that GS1 has something like that? I have some dim memory...
Using @FirefoxNightly? Try setting layout.css.servo.enabled to true!
Seems to work well so far. (Suggested by @jwajsberg)
♥ 1↺ 2
Replying to @jwajsberg and @FirefoxNightly
I'm not on the Aurora channel so I'm pretty used to that!
Replying to @jensimmons
Do you know what type of snake it was?
I’ve been looking at «Web Science», because it should match a lot of my interests. It’s proving hard to find a usable entry point.
♥ 3
This seems to be the journal with the most content (not much). It published from 2011 to 2014. inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcod…
♥ 2
There is also webscience-journal.net with an insane throughput of four articles per year since 2015.
Replying to @mariejulien and @Bouletcorp
J’ai essayé deux ou trois fois de commencer une saison, sur les conseils de fans — je n’ai jamais réussi à finir un épisode.
Humani nil a me alienum puto.
Well, except the people getting mad over #DrWho being a woman. Alienum those, very much.
Replying to @anatudor and @ShaneHudson, @jwajsberg
I don’t know if I’m qualified to declare it «normal», but it certainly feels very, very familiar! 🙃
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @IanMulvany
Yes, I’m aware of lots of great stuff that’s applicable but not released under a «Web Science» label. Netsci certainly has strong web roots!
Replying to @null and @IanMulvany
I guess I’m wondering if «Web Science» actually makes sense as a distinct label for that area. It certainly doesn’t seem to stick.
Continuing on my #WebScience spree. "A Framework for Web Science". In many ways very 2006, but plenty hasn't been resolved since.
♥ 1
Oh, it's ridiculously overpriced but you can get second hand copies at saner cost. Mine smells of burnt plastic, but hey it's the Web ;-)
♥ 1
There's a lot to like in the US, but seriously folks, WTF is the story behind the drowning of perfectly fine sushi rolls in mayonnaise?
♥ 5
Replying to @JibberJim
I think you have France confused with Belgium? I've never seen mayonnaise once my chips.
Replying to @JibberJim
That's... McDonald's. Responsibility for Vichy, Rwanda, sure, but not that.
I wonder how much paper is wasted annually just because browsers insist on sucking at printing.
♥ 5
Replying to @skdh and @addthis
Someone should totally start a "Demons as Drawn by Physicists" art collection.
♥ 3
Replying to @Chris_Perry_61
I doubt it has its own rendering engine, no?
Replying to @null and @soilandreyes
In fairness that’s not browsers’ fault, but yeah, I hear you!
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
DOIs?
Replying to @seanmcarroll
When used well, either can be decent. If you’re bad at presentations, Prezi just gives you more rope to shoot yourself in the foot with.
♥ 4
Replying to @seanmcarroll
It’s the old Web saying: «Design on the Web is like sex in a bathtub: if you know nothing abt sex it won’t help to be an expert on bathtubs»
♥ 7↺ 2
Nested Links (has a few inaccuracies, but amused me all the same): kizu.ru/en/fun/nested-… (via @nhoizey)
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @nhoizey
Oui moi aussi, mais ça m’a bien fait marrer.
Replying to @null and @dauwhe, @nhoizey
Yes — it works. Throw in role=doc-footnote on the object and it’s even borderline semantic!
Replying to @null and @nhoizey
Pour nous c’est le genre de question qui revient tout le temps, surtout des p dans des p ou ce genre de chose.
Replying to @null and @nhoizey
Sémantiquement, on a des cas de paragraphes en plusieurs parties où tu as du texte, la phrase ne s’arrête pas mais contient un bloc (maths…
Replying to @null and @nhoizey
…ou liste typiquement) puis la phrase reprend. Les puristes voudraient pointer, annoter ça comme un unique paragraphe.
Replying to @null and @nhoizey
L’exemple de @dauwhe avec un p dans une footnotes inline est assez classique aussi du p-dans-un-p.
Replying to @null and @dauwhe, @nhoizey
That doesn’t work though, the inner `aside` gets pushed to after the `p`. There is magic in `object`.
Replying to @null and @nhoizey, @dauwhe
Tu ne la rends pas forcément là visuellement, mais le contenu est à un endroit «logique» par rapport au sens.
Replying to @sophgaston and @ElliotLepers, @ppppolls
I would guess that those who think otherwise have already left the ship.
♥ 1
Replying to @LeaVerou
Not pg-specific but if it has logical subtrees I've done similar using clarinet to break into pieces before loading. github.com/dscape/clarinet
Not sure if clarinet is current state of the art. Anything that will give you the JSON SAX-like ought to work.
If you need to store the whole thing as a single record though, not sure!
Replying to @torgo and @prushforth, @LeonieWatson
I'd watch that!
Replying to @temptoetiam
Derrière chez moi j'ai vu un groupe de corbeaux gérer un faucon, c'était effrayant. Ils plongeaient dessus pour l'empêcher de partir.
♥ 1
Le pauvre faucon criait, ils lui arrachaient des plumes à chaque passage. Il a fini par s'enfuir, mais bien mal en point.
Donc fuck with a murder of crows.
♥ 1
Now you know.
Replying to @ourmaninjapan
Seriously?! How come this isn't more common knowledge?
Replying to @ourmaninjapan
Whoa. Just. Whoa.
Engineering: basically the art of preventing emergence.
Quoting a tweet by @zeigenvector ↗
Replying to @ourmaninjapan
I plan to test on self, usually they find me quite yummy 😋 I think my 8yo would do things easily, not sure about the 4yo.
Replying to @ourmaninjapan and @marsf
Huh, worth a shot, thanks! I assume that's solid as well opposed to the weird gooey stuff some people use, nothing special?
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
Not all crushes are creepy. Eg an intellectual crush.
Replying to @tabatkins and @dauwhe
You mean, if the list of people I have Twitter notifications on for were to become public, that would be embarrassing? 😇
♥ 1
Replying to @Keithamus and @patrickhamann
Same here, works great. Also, I found a trick to reboot just the TouchBar OS once, though I can't seem to find it again :-/
♥ 1
Replying to @HenriHelvetica and @mjackson, @HTTPArchive
Do you know if the pace is increasing as well?
Replying to @ElieSl and @mariejulien, @JulienMoya
Vous devriez en parler sur politiqu.es. 😚
Replying to @CT_Bergstrom and @existentialcoms
I reckon "The Theory of the Mountain of Shit" pretty much speaks for itself :-)
♥ 2
Replying to @janl
And a pain to debug. And a source of bugs. Given multiple options from npm, it almost never go for a streaming module anymore.
Replying to @heydonworks and @janl
There's a point for a number of cases. I used equivalents a lot in Perl. But in Node it's basically a premature optimisation turned popular.
♥ 3
Replying to @temptoetiam
Non, mais j'ai pensé la même chose. Le Xennial a connu le vinyle dans sa fraîche jeunesse.
The English Historical Review compares @C_Berthezene to Tocqueville for her «Training Minds for the War of Ideas» 👏🏻
academic.oup.com/ehr/article-ab…
♥ 4↺ 1
Replying to @null and @marcosc, @MichielBijl
Nope. I wrote plans for it at some point but decided against it. My opinion is that multipage specs are a sign of bad spec design.
Replying to @skdh
Children cause it, but it then becomes infinitely communicable by any bearer of any motile species.
♥ 1
Replying to @trekonomics
Whoa, some of the block material under this tweet... 🤢 Who the fuck left the moron factory running overnight?
Replying to @trekonomics
I have no idea, but I don’t think so. Could easily find that out empirically.
♥ 1
Amadou & Mariam set Prospect Park, Brooklyn, on fire.
♥ 3
Bon, en même temps j'attends toujours qu'ils acceptent de jouer mon tube en puissance "Honni Soit Qui Mali Pense". 🇲🇱
♥ 1
Replying to @patrick_h_lauke and @heydonworks
Well, they *are* scrambling to attract the financial sector and startups...
Replying to @jwajsberg and @ElieSl, @manueldiaz
Bien sûr, mais c'est pas comme si ça ne faisait pas vingt ans qu'on les crée!
Replying to @sapinker
The problem with peers (that they see often) is that they're likely with the same bilingual background & you can't pick which lang they use!
Valerian: nul à chier. Dialogues pourris, aucune action, sexisme, etc. On dirait un mauvais film des 90s.
Looking for the @SMBCComics about the overqualified female sidekicks (as a perfect description of Valerian), but can't find. Any pointer?
Replying to @alanstearns and @SMBCComics
Thanks, but it looks like it’s not one of the indexed ones (OhNoRobot only has a subset).
♥ 1
They don't get killed. They hibernate until the next generation reinvents them. Eventually, some pass into usage.
Quoting a tweet by @dauwhe ↗
♥ 5↺ 1
Replying to @null and @Floppy
Yeah, it really sucks. Pick one browser where it works, print to PDF, link PDF. Painful, stupid, but works. Eg cv.berjon.com.
Replying to @allafarce
Books, made of paper. If engaging enough they'll disconnect anything IME.
♥ 1
Luc Besson ne lit pas. Ça explique le point ahurissant auquel Valerian est mal écrit.
Quoting a tweet by @AlexHervaud ↗
♥ 2
I'm guessing "Usage Elasticity" might capture the idea. When the dam breaks, your service collapses. I think FB Messenger has to be close.
♥ 1↺ 2
J'avais oublié cette pratique de salopards des bars parisiens qui t'amènent de l'Évian pour la grenadine.
♥ 1
Replying to @null and @vlentz, @Medium, @facebook
Je ne parle pas de ça, juste de la nullité croissante de certains services qui ne se traduit pas par une perte immédiate d'utilisateurs.
Replying to @teleclimber and @Medium, @facebook
Sort of, but for the Medium it's content more than network.
♥ 1
Replying to @AmeliasBrain
That's part of it, but it's not just for social media.
Remember: Flash was killed first and foremost by mobile performance.
Who's next?
Quoting a tweet by @Adobe ↗
♥ 2↺ 1
Replying to @bfluzin
Ah ouais Notepad c'est bien minimaliste.
Replying to @null and @siilime, @Medium, @facebook
It's hard, but I would argue that Messenger shows there's lower even than the Facebook app.
Replying to @Trinart
Nothing on the Web :-)
Visas approved, looks like you'll have to suffer my presence in the US a little while longer.
♥ 10
"The Lifecycle of Software Objects", by Ted Chiang. Some good ideas, but predicable structure, nothing overwhelmingly memorable.
Replying to @alexmilowski
I don't think that ever killed any tech :-)
Replying to @skdh
What type of talk at what type of conference and what process the speaker had to go through?
7, de Tristan Garcia. Style pataud, détails voulant choquer façon branchouille BFM, ça me tombe des mains. Il n'y a que moi?
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
Me too! Where are you headed?
Replying to @null and @dauwhe
Whoa, have fun! I'm off to Champagne this afternoon :-)
Replying to @__apf__
Ha! My TLS is flawless!
Replying to @seanmcarroll
There are many good reasons to strengthen our hand in naturalised ethics, this is one of them. But is AI on our top ten list of threats?
Seriously @Forbes, you need to retract. Not even the title makes any sense; the rest of the article is deranged mutant snake oil.
Quoting a tweet by @adactio ↗
♥ 1↺ 1
Replying to @msantolini
Ha! En parlant de septembre... On peut faire la pub maintenant? Ça serait cool de pouvoir linker au site 😇
♥ 1
One interesting aspect of emojis is that they are written-only text, text with no obvious vocalisation. Is there linguistic precedent?
♥ 2
Replying to @msantolini
Oui :-) Mais comme je ne vois rien sur le site, je n'étais pas sûr.
Replying to @LeonieWatson
I think the mapping to spoken language is much closer. I presume writers/readers have a sound in their head when handling those.
Replying to @LeonieWatson
I was precisely wondering how they are read? Do you mostly get the Unicode name?
Replying to @null and @_james_fuller
It could be spoken if needed though.
Replying to @edasfr
👯♀️🔰👘🎏? (But good point)
Replying to @null and @_james_fuller
That's a wee bit older than medieval Latin!
Replying to @edasfr
Certes, mais il y a une différence qui me paraît plus que de degré.
Delighted to say that I'll be speaking at #CCS17 about the Web as a substrate for human/machine hybrid intelligence! ccs2017.wixsite.com/adhesion
♥ 9↺ 2
Replying to @domenic and @LeonieWatson
That matches my understanding of Japanese (admittedly based on Murakami characters explaining how to pronounce their names). However...
...what you describe always has a vocalisation even if you don't know which. That happens in English too (eg "read").
♥ 1
Replying to @nicoleamurray
Interesting. Is it only not meant to be vocalised, or does it have no obvious vocalisation? LMAO isn't meant to be, but I vocalise it easily
Replying to @nicoleamurray
It's a lot less clear to me how to vocalise something like 😆 or 🤣.
Replying to @nicoleamurray and @edasfr
Yes, they clearly have very strong semantics :-)
Replying to @AmeliasBrain
People vocalise maths all the time! It's embarrassingly overloaded, but people speak it. That said, knot theory notation seems hard to speak
Replying to @Trinart
Yeah, there's the small detail of financing the trip but I'll have something figured out by then!
♥ 1
Replying to @dylanbarrell and @LeonieWatson
I don't think we know for sure. But I would think they would could be read as whatever ancient Egyptian was.
Replying to @edasfr
Je pense qu'il y a un nombre de cas qui de substitution non négligeable. Mais je n'ai pas de chiffres à l'appui.
Replying to @LeonieWatson and @domenic
But how would you know? There isn't a clear set of pronunciations that others would recognise.
♥ 1
Replying to @LeonieWatson and @domenic
According to Wikipedia, hieroglyphs were actually plain and simple phonetic. Like Finnish it would seem.
Replying to @Ls01
Oh mais ce sont des dahuts!
Replying to @Ls01
On les reconnaît à la longueur des pattes. Tu devrais pouvoir organiser une chasse à la tombée du jour.
Replying to @edasfr
Ou je passe trop de temps sur le twitter 😆
Replying to @nicoleamurray
I dunno, I've told enough people to RTFM :-)
Replying to @nicoleamurray
But photographs aren't verbal. I reckon the closest are facial expressions.
Replying to @ubiquitic
You see concepts? Like Sixth Sense Wittgenstein?
Replying to @LeonieWatson
I wish it would. Varying glyphs makes them ambiguous, a common text mapping would address that.
Replying to @LeonieWatson
If only we knew people involved in standards!
Yo dawg, I heard you like legacy document formats so I put some...
Quoting a tweet by @TeXtip ↗
Replying to @mrgunn
Also mark a reply as key to the thread so you don't get the same point twenty times.
♥ 1